Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp1865818rwa; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:44:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7uBd+dGw6ecc1yQ+pyjNR5gQjbpKLwo16BLK8oeBveA4oYT2Btn0C/VSDafwAbJHc5nulI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1995:b0:52d:5c39:3f61 with SMTP id d21-20020a056a00199500b0052d5c393f61mr18770772pfl.83.1661136241099; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:44:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661136241; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XUOudrLjLYM7u3rKf0tNPU79vVTXy0GZo8OCACN+ZKFXdEeiN56OlIrWw3/7QG/xXV xqW6DFd8W8TDop/ceuCF12v2JDulGlA/OBbyW3visBGweiEBaoXbEhI/ZOxjgJ3jGnxz o8mT5Dfed3pCBfXZIGRzopJrAj4/Vm/uTxQ44qM48BegsAf8aygDjMV+n8kGWsYPuDCr 7WfbaN5S6fTGUcetlnGBr3f0Z3Ii9Pdeliym3FE3nvS9vmQEJWZne/pzjz8PtKie6u2Z /G4sZ2iS9hvg4qQWVPbOfw0XVyQelFDPYM850+5NXBeIDmMIpiXoC+xOOtpPxuSc1xSX DpGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=5Zb9ZmQRaeUHvNWIPnwBfcKvFWkG8hWFUQnwJTNy3kE=; b=RSsb+eySR51CmmVPliUyKdF9M2TpiGZvQI2gj3gYHTYOOAAI5ggGYG3zqzVtbuTCUH JX/jhVCBrL4bYpRzUGkoyXrRxOMIiiM0ff0vhjIAZouO1kEKZnhbxxqMxAsfPGjBy06a clSMcROcC8rtDigrjvBEuySU0vRcr6nEgI0+b96kPgdxOewDzXV07RWhmY76AjueIDNA 9aw0c2NlEnv4KjiJvoh4ULWvXXzWCwJhBDw3fqyudG27pFasAd3VxJ1vXZX9R30FyieS TI5d+/wWZyruoau9d9v1Ke3EcbAdq3sWFTyxM3UCWpXuiaEjno7o/JWI9kPBI2oqtq2O W8VA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ZND58+hr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w29-20020a63935d000000b00412b3d1a154si11149277pgm.734.2022.08.21.19.43.49; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ZND58+hr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232593AbiHVCe0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40438 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232580AbiHVCeU (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:20 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBD122B21 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661135659; x=1692671659; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QVIKac2TXXwtCKl68qr2q3XupTvP7bG4gHMbUWl00rA=; b=ZND58+hrl2StoKXbGclPXNsKhKW3m8m659el84jbY0s1/KMCTSruXZ+g sR321qlJ4E+Me5x9h/Bm3Lnu+tM4vCtxPmmw5vFX4xj2XOA9GywucBySq EfWVZCgkBP4itinfAdxM0IT9/f1n236+YVH4zwFVAniJV2pVPrHivgOmi 0U4PV0C1izRbfdkViIyQbY6Oz05Y+JK7E8MsPL2PSdxPFMk44s9dFyE0w XS8pGr2upkA8bTjn0zijD9cebsuCDd36R38F/pGzDSKsV6yaNi7p30qJM 0Dia/4e9BTkVbQoyqVnqKUqvebxswvzlA5l472sMW4gu/+SxOYseEY34f g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10446"; a="294092625" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,254,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="294092625" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2022 19:34:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,254,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="936851013" Received: from q.bj.intel.com ([10.238.154.102]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2022 19:34:16 -0700 From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Karolina Drobnik , Rebecca Mckeever , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_reserve() 129th region Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:33:27 +0800 Message-Id: <20220822023332.127633-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220822023332.127633-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> References: <20220822023332.127633-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shaoqin Huang Reserve 129th region in the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region. At the same time, reserve 128 faked memory region, and make sure these reserved region not intersect with the valid memory region. So memblock_double_array() will choose the valid memory region, and it will success. Also need to restore the reserved.regions after memblock_double_array(), to make sure the subsequent tests can run as normal. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c index c8e201156cdc..d8defc9866cb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c @@ -686,6 +686,92 @@ static int memblock_reserve_twice_check(void) return 0; } +/* + * A test that tries to reserve the 129th memory block. + * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the + * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as + * reserved.regions. + */ +static int memblock_reserve_many_check(void) +{ + int i; + void *orig_region; + struct region r = { + .base = SZ_16K, + .size = MEM_SIZE, + }; + phys_addr_t memory_base = SZ_128K; + phys_addr_t new_reserved_regions_size; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + + reset_memblock_regions(); + memblock_allow_resize(); + + /* Add a valid memory region used by double_array(). */ + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)get_memory_block_base(), MEM_SIZE); + + for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) { + /* Reserve some fakes memory region to fulfill the memblock. */ + memblock_reserve(memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, i + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + + /* Keep the gap so these memory region will not be merged. */ + memory_base += MEM_SIZE * 2; + } + + orig_region = memblock.reserved.regions; + + /* This reserve the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. */ + memblock_reserve(memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + /* + * This is the memory region size used by the doubled reserved.regions, + * and it has been reserved due to it has been used. The size is used to + * calculate the total_size that the memblock.reserved have now. + */ + new_reserved_regions_size = PAGE_ALIGN((INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2) * + sizeof(struct memblock_region)); + /* + * The double_array() will find a free memory region as the new + * reserved.regions, and the used memory region will be reserved, so + * there will be one more region exist in the reserved memblock. And the + * one more reserved region's size is new_reserved_regions_size. + */ + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1 + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE + + new_reserved_regions_size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + /* The base is very small, so it should be insert to the first region. */ + memblock_reserve(r.base, r.size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.regions[0].base, r.base); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.regions[0].size, r.size); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2 + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE + + new_reserved_regions_size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); + + /* + * The current reserved.regions is occupying a range of memory that + * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory, + * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure + * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array. + */ + memblock.reserved.regions = orig_region; + memblock.reserved.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + static int memblock_reserve_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -698,6 +784,7 @@ static int memblock_reserve_checks(void) memblock_reserve_overlap_bottom_check(); memblock_reserve_within_check(); memblock_reserve_twice_check(); + memblock_reserve_many_check(); prefix_pop(); -- 2.34.1