Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp1870195rwa; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:52:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5FWVj8T3ClYvFuXgYkyCZdCfER3yI6ScPAzry1WEtm9TMCw+UsjHHJhMtazuTxbIe8x3Wh X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cc01:b0:1fa:cfad:dfe0 with SMTP id b1-20020a17090acc0100b001facfaddfe0mr19912344pju.244.1661136732751; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:52:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661136732; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KXevPob/pl43NB/2Y8xUfMALUf8/eaurDIQtsCS+pcqtHCheABvumanop0LnNId310 nsDIi3CyLWSfIAYw0BrLxJizNAhTyjqsobKdw68ZNt8BAugS9R3nWCiEHNLbjsS+J0af P2otQfpwHyxoeLt3ocSkQXedFkshlXqQZTqdFo3+wJ9RAR7siSJL1FI4jGpZ24g5u7lO 5s2eBpXKVAMqK9BaXGlM6yYKesTJBuU+UZ/rICJvt54CXLC1wdM4oBSg6VDysuppBo8W 4mPdcDtPnGXWmxdB05m/cJg0+pkWAhiyBv5AO42ySEof+cJHxKDw6C5206n0/bNzkMXI wGNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=NEGYaYJzdelbjCumy0HxQKBqLEQfLzGDN5upuyaEks4=; b=s3WR1izzsdL54CYxI2ARfrvFc1trSIavXYY6TCnLKmJQLsq2iVA2Ptuhwttfoc/3BK l8wCSjVki6jq8genaD3AujsEPXfGRfublajYlVmrW/CWp1DA/4UPUWwKk98N72TurQkI ZDTAppv6R8/6S9CVzaaGAHzHZq2vZbSWMGcwK4321tU1wgUDv8EpYgIb9z42nGy94rL2 n8RSsXIaH6DCvhq8PVC9skwkBQgSaJrBAg1W+aUfTTNZnZAyaZzd7KWq4Z6lqbqnmLfj 9njup/wnP4JGrUs/84OEWn2TxpkGQlBO7fNMq7uZ7XD/ZuIIZyb3P9VGw67zYpRuBGEG kvzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=TEIxn6ZC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mh1-20020a17090b4ac100b001fa92c95266si12291515pjb.172.2022.08.21.19.52.00; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=TEIxn6ZC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232589AbiHVCeS (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40352 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232072AbiHVCeO (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:14 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919CE22B21 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:34:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661135652; x=1692671652; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KPhCPAzla3xL6aF2KqP7SjNhGa8CdHxEYyvAfy1+zq0=; b=TEIxn6ZCANZqC4aGEVB1sTR/sFFvkNuBH+Klh6kyPhkObGGsE3uCDiz5 Q+Iz6pmVSGAmqg4LD6JCEYetyu5SFNgn0pp3jjJK66PgpmKVY0xwB61kX TXNxKrQvSbB/zrIOLGBqmY0a0XY77uovAlkWB+54qfKtX34MrsF0Xhj9M MVr+qjB2uy5vrhhpkHLPKUTB0D95i9+LhgocKfwtzhPuGaFwvrJz3L1pg eTzePrGbxblBpj+IOXuPoFFss/WrEVPGmaUB1Js3tmEz49JeyFx1lbuQI YXCR+VYvSy63mybFG0pCA2FcBc4kXAJn1Tsxdk9F7jXpJ4oU2+iDufj1D w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10446"; a="292047440" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,254,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="292047440" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2022 19:34:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,254,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="936851000" Received: from q.bj.intel.com ([10.238.154.102]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2022 19:34:10 -0700 From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Karolina Drobnik , Rebecca Mckeever , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:33:26 +0800 Message-Id: <20220822023332.127633-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220822023332.127633-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> References: <20220822023332.127633-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shaoqin Huang Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region, and fake the other memory region, so it make sure the memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init(). So memblock_double_array() must success. Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 7 +- tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 3 + 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c index 66f46f261e66..c8e201156cdc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c @@ -326,6 +326,87 @@ static int memblock_add_twice_check(void) return 0; } +/* + * A test that tries to add the 129th memory block. + * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the + * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as + * memory.regions. + */ +static int memblock_add_many_check(void) +{ + int i; + void *orig_region; + struct region r = { + .base = SZ_16K, + .size = MEM_SIZE, + }; + phys_addr_t memory_base = SZ_128K; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + + reset_memblock_regions(); + memblock_allow_resize(); + + /* + * Add one valid memory region, this will be choosed to be the memory + * that new memory.regions occupied. + */ + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)get_memory_block_base(), MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, MEM_SIZE); + + for (i = 1; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) { + /* Add some fakes memory region to fulfill the memblock. */ + memblock_add(memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, i + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + + /* Keep the gap so these memory region will not be merged. */ + memory_base += MEM_SIZE * 2; + } + + orig_region = memblock.memory.regions; + + /* This adds the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. */ + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + /* This is the size used by new memory.regions. Check it. */ + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, PAGE_ALIGN(INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2 * + sizeof(struct memblock_region))); + + /* The base is very small, so it should be insert to the first region. */ + memblock_add(r.base, r.size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].base, r.base); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].size, r.size); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); + + /* + * The current memory.regions is occupying a range of memory that + * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory, + * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure + * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array. + */ + memblock.memory.regions = orig_region; + memblock.memory.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + static int memblock_add_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -339,6 +420,7 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void) memblock_add_overlap_bottom_check(); memblock_add_within_check(); memblock_add_twice_check(); + memblock_add_many_check(); prefix_pop(); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c index e43b2676af81..89684ec00aa2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ #include #include -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS #define PREFIXES_MAX 15 #define DELIM ": " @@ -75,6 +73,11 @@ void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void) free(memory_block.base); } +void *get_memory_block_base(void) +{ + return memory_block.base; +} + static void usage(const char *prog) { BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(help_opts) != ARRAY_SIZE(long_opts) - 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h index 3e7f23d341d7..98b0a0ec629d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include <../selftests/kselftest.h> #define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS /** * ASSERT_EQ(): @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ void reset_memblock_attributes(void); void setup_memblock(void); void dummy_physical_memory_init(void); void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void); +void *get_memory_block_base(void); void parse_args(int argc, char **argv); void test_fail(void); -- 2.34.1