Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0cdf42e6ee7d97033020d7a09b74cec23cde03a6.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: regression bisect  --> 88f1669019bd " scsi: sd: Rework
 asynchronous resume support"
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To:     lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, ericspero@icloud.com,
        jason600.groome@gmail.com
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:07:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <ca8052efe4d1357bc6ece0a45e8429de37e3ae03.camel@gmx.de>
References: <ca8052efe4d1357bc6ece0a45e8429de37e3ae03.camel@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2022-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My box claims this patch is a dud for it, symptom being hang during
> suspend _after_ a successful suspend/resume cycle. Revert at bisect
> starting point and now HEAD (15b3f48a4339) confirms box's assertion.

Should have tried lappy yesterday too, but had to run.. 2nd suspend
hang is repeatable there too, as is revert curing it.

	-Mike