Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp2234342rwa; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:40:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6FsbQLNJQ4kn6U+HoP9l5vOEyeiWDtr5Nnr5UJmtPLVF+DFs9gEMEE2JIx/zlRLa8u79O4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1f01:b0:445:fbe8:4b2e with SMTP id b1-20020a0564021f0100b00445fbe84b2emr15841148edb.192.1661168452284; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:40:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661168452; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ylRMtpf3EADjrTeCW4oaOc/YYq72Ygn7RhXOdmrYJW2+UUmxeO0mmNwaf98O47YeX9 cJzukvgSlMMWrgF6Y+ez6A69UxYNUEZ8vCsrLk9Hiwf5oufDeLnUJyy3i04Yc1YHZOA4 cwyhkqtANHH6ZWXC3Y73J6R7Vp4sxKiYmjGh4BB0lTSjo59BDvrFzFakOZgzi/6GCEgj 1USWGiRhvHnvBzwnE3XaPpemu2exuaLdxABJQunw2s/xftIbc4w3ma5nkPyxe7i9Bof9 rRigNkCfYLQ4FOlzz5BA6YA742DViSl7DKYHGDb64E34kbmbV3I7v02R2XG3rTw1kZOa uSjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=cgJN2ys9qVPNZ5LS8BKgDsHmvC/ytmOYuYaJYA/HCmg=; b=iVJNiu8hJ856VapREoqkGkXetUrzAACeW7EW9nV1GPmQ83ZhyFtpBLrF/blQy0UA9p zvsxWDkYIRLtUyLNb7yEBK0CbWkuwA86TcY3LU+DoZ6uAOeYpMJj9jn0dvBEfDRqkJug y/x/Be6FRv61lgB7FVZdCBTgFu2qd98d4NrnrCI7+0qYBGuYTvSwL2WbSsJcyuwXrlpy 6DVIZv7h3fXZGq9KCTLpJ+ySkvatmBKO5UzKQWKvuQIoq+3B00YouomHRpUjVuXPAL13 paupn5c/VljiP6j3AM0OfJ/QltQZtmQP463U+3v9jIvMBAOFAomfqmlIhQWkhpIlI4OA CspA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=dp12s38R; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qw25-20020a1709066a1900b007317756bc04si12436127ejc.1006.2022.08.22.04.40.25; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=dp12s38R; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229658AbiHVLUu (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:20:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47192 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231649AbiHVLUq (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:20:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCD01EAFE for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id gt3so8048773ejb.12 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=cgJN2ys9qVPNZ5LS8BKgDsHmvC/ytmOYuYaJYA/HCmg=; b=dp12s38RtePIj9ZwHxOMYV2XISJFfRJui+/uiiQF7B5539RHm0SmyzakQqhAluf7Mc ZexTMrxhsOjYh4hIW/BK4OfL0v4oMY5bwAprTNFfHdxE+DfAOflCnV8hLIhTDBz1FBM6 Ufk/PGgg1jp1ruzvmCZndel0jQQWxyIZBVnFCkHZYngDz2Onhm2REId9OBDjCqNVkDlU uZXi9Q/c6eLgJVt7kk13pYitak+3Tpbsy1u9NrFaRh13R4uT2WEvRiKg4DfrlTMvZJ7E Ht3BgtUiN8SuJcczU7B1GK0Kyh0r4Q/4uddqYPNkJdNIJ67jJFlYt8SwTVMxB7QVfCX2 o2pA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=cgJN2ys9qVPNZ5LS8BKgDsHmvC/ytmOYuYaJYA/HCmg=; b=WSYze+xMRqwDGCJTRZfZ4h1rfDkawR3TUNOE9sc9gnXjbE0MAfyLSII4OZSJzMjw7X XrelR5acIYoQ5zctJsRQxdxueSaGPbdJgYrDBelllPi9iaQvGmCWqMXodeQTFh+sjC9n SK1J2SzhoQg+s5CkjxSxJu7wHz++Hav/3B43XnoYLGGRYFWcXijP+PuJmZv7MiW9RFeq ACWB+MJMf/xdGuFAVDJMyXaleG/VwsPc+v7ZQVpg5g/77fHhoujoRolBvfCKWaE1zFHz rPZ07APupkGqtH+8Hmc8+iP3612yA9Jn6IiPQZO4U9Gtyz6aZnNyBkK64S9odkAR0KPU dNwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0gzz5XXyB4wwFux3vjVLZ2PRxRUUKhzt6231MpkPjyGi6oVI61 qJ8215U5YgkQBSTseq4/XOQ0SCI1pYmDs8brtpwE6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:974f:b0:73d:716a:7d98 with SMTP id o15-20020a170906974f00b0073d716a7d98mr4732698ejy.208.1661167244102; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:20:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220815110240.18293-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20220815110240.18293-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:20:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: Recover kretprobes return address for EABI stack unwinder To: Chen Zhongjin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de, ardb@kernel.org, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, rostedt@goodmis.org, nick.hawkins@hpe.com, john@phrozen.org, mhiramat@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:06 PM Chen Zhongjin wrote: > 'fed240d9c974 ("ARM: Recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace")' > has implemented kretprobes return address recovery for FP > unwinder, this patch makes it works for EABI unwinder. > > It saves __kretprobe_trampoline address in LR on stack to identify > and recover the correct return address in EABI unwinder. > > Since EABI doesn't use r11 as frame pointer, we need to use SP to > identify different kretprobes addresses. Here the value of SP has fixed > distance to conventional FP position so it's fine to use it. > > Passed kunit kprobes_test on QEMU. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin This looks correct to me FWIW I understand the assembly but I'm vaguely unfamiliar with the kprobe API, but anyway: Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Would you please drop it into Russell's patch tracker? Yours, Linus Walleij