Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Export new 'graph.dot' file in debugfs
From:   =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Povi=C5=A1er?= <povik+lin@cutebit.org>
In-Reply-To: <YwN+0yHSOSC2aD+J@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:11:48 +0200
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6EDC1D4B-4B84-49A2-A60A-EA15D27251A7@cutebit.org>
References: <20220822095242.3779-1-povik+lin@cutebit.org>
 <YwN2Pd4Ez08yDFno@sirena.org.uk>
 <3234D74E-0DFF-4BB5-87ED-6135BAC1F31D@cutebit.org>
 <YwN+0yHSOSC2aD+J@sirena.org.uk>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk


> On 22. 8. 2022, at 15:04, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Martin Povi=C5=A1er wrote:
>>> On 22. 8. 2022, at 14:27, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>=20
>>> There was a tool floating about in the past (last copy I knew about =
was
>>> on Wolfson's git but they took that down) - can we not just continue =
to
>>> do that?
>=20
>> I don=E2=80=99t know the tool or where would I find it. I think =
it=E2=80=99s neat
>=20
> Copying in Charles and Richard who might know about the status of the
> tool Dimitris wrote.

Thanks.

>> simply having a =E2=80=98graph.dot=E2=80=99 at hand, especially since =
it requires
>> little code. (Although sure there=E2=80=99s the danger of it =
growing.)
>=20
> I'm also worried about people going in and wanting other more tool
> specific formats adding, if we didn't have anything at all it'd be one
> thing but we do have something.

Sure, although I would argue DOT is by a large margin the standard
format to represent graphs in.

Best,
Martin