Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:29:10 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc:     acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
        jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
        eranian@google.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, megha.dey@intel.com,
        frederic@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com,
        kim.phillips@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        santosh.shukla@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] perf: Rewrite core context handling
Message-ID: <YwOgxhfS99Rquwct@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220113134743.1292-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
 <YqdLH+ZU/sf4n0pa@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YqdL8LsOvxNqhz/v@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <f994d403-df7b-d88e-8324-c29d0ef2034e@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f994d403-df7b-d88e-8324-c29d0ef2034e@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 11:41:42AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> 
> > pulling up the ctx->mutex makes things simpler, but also violates the
> > locking order vs exec_update_lock.
> > 
> > Pull that lock up as well...
> 
> I'm not able to apply this patch as is but I get the idea. Few
> questions below...

I was just about to rebase the 'series' to current, let me do that and
get back to you on the specifics.