Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp2669085rwa; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR54gslZ276oiJFUaHc9a9LMM38epGwCCVIRZskG9FG/T+By4qBXXsIP5PZp0KIVSWhtBGWr X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b0c:b0:1f4:ffac:699a with SMTP id lx12-20020a17090b4b0c00b001f4ffac699amr29706099pjb.145.1661192762742; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661192762; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DQqj+J2PMFH4jXcSM9S70vyQUezMDhHEdSlk4GuaOsPW90KHSBiOV17xc6SCtOns5D nlzfn3HLCWT6oeb/yMr5NxJlRSNbHZb3HtzjqBpyd7mTZG9kYBGPPbIg1/qV90A8leL5 RRgIvT7mBpfKqr8Hzq8aALSdnEBEruiM+ndVqtUQ+kVxpRF9Jjvj6ZC+J89zXIIdbBhF B7Xk8HsX/MH48icNq6hqaWA+NuJGcal/LNMPoMUFY4K0gxIC6WWq4pfsQ/YZ+q/g9xrl qsAFAO3aA4n25gShpbztNY2hYQlL6EAYcBcy171FMHUTWRcqapm87iWoV0uGwJIGqMwX vD1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=LZt4EKW2Klj6HswzcAhuLRqO+KGezqgdN643l6Y4ioE=; b=ZxhHufsI6woqXsSb7P4wCl2O5vJGoxV8q/7jejg5Y/1wDUjy3A77qwNbK3ZQqbXiIG O2cxZ/yHp4IKSi6XauFJ0zFRFkvMSZfoSeuHhHCMTqheT2FE2shc4aMvyjURifqgN1N2 CAHd7KBQl0vpkYtg21pTOjQx3ZKGxqMr60tBjJkw60p3eddACQQaK/p6k+u7mPIHxU4T BjlMJNSuJXXx7RgJKcGw9BBtRxUDqvmUc5WG//j+0VM/ou7B4t4q4/QKs5aB64zu5Gfv dvwwEvJ0Yb98DmlYV033eLnGKJI6ci2uMJegWHBYz9bbrK+rzEbxZYWqytLUX7exdTbu Iplw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@stgolabs.net header.s=dreamhost header.b=l+fH5hxu; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jg7-20020a17090326c700b001728e96f695si10049886plb.563.2022.08.22.11.25.51; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@stgolabs.net header.s=dreamhost header.b=l+fH5hxu; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236531AbiHVRfO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:35:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237061AbiHVRfL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:35:11 -0400 Received: from crane.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (crane.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D0540BC6; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535298E25E2; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a277.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 713E78E0C8E; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:35:02 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1661189702; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QCAl5xH3V3JdRF4LDIGoG/mm3ITqYi00GwJlCI/NfKiZThuyeQXhjjrcOFt0iVo0h2L2q7 VGvU/z4b6QHSdwkySQlQPjkdvZvRqKN1nJBQu0vNysq5wiGO6xdY44H/rNrtuuW0TUugHz i6f1sfC/myz4jpm/05unIwjeBRHpt+liFz/vQRfq/E72xbmpo7UZNkkA6X55naogjNYeZV 1+/+P6X4D26Lb84/V1z14ZpC6Lp/SV73twFWDhe29KUm+tpyLyQRiOVgApRstUqG6/ZoOB ayTqzrHuvjFnhINVQSP6T90/JnRieS+zs0QLTIovvrewtOaulrKyEFtb8hXl6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1661189702; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=LZt4EKW2Klj6HswzcAhuLRqO+KGezqgdN643l6Y4ioE=; b=z0IZxbGdIOluzPrYLkJroyVo8BpCEz0yNM2h+IdIFPvrm6PiqXxvXx+bJKsdHxWJAWjSoI RCobVIsaenMkSuZhjTJLc+cmpkA/XxuKCzHCx6hBGkq1fL1nX3BEG+s9eNWrxr5Hfbdsz5 sb5x/W0jgkR2SB2T8vusMJc5yyfmKZaYravWLh46vYfGqiWmIp0pumJ6PIBm/+N6MzkDUn bPNIMBejliodQMELpt9njDgfBRcdNoI3OsJQTZ03+nV8ASv9FmvnicWeWIbRrYoBIwPgRy ZMFeWqBudF1HwuDOZ6cTlRz+pfpfPXzcZQvvID69YCkMbpC/NEmmZWSwzUsY2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-769cfffc99-7h8h8; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=dave@stgolabs.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Desert-Battle: 64f1b0cf2bad831f_1661189702782_2177706590 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1661189702782:1915979762 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1661189702782 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a277.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.115.45.14 (trex/6.7.1); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:35:02 +0000 Received: from offworld (unknown [104.36.31.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dave@stgolabs.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a277.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MBKHn5vY1z2m; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:35:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stgolabs.net; s=dreamhost; t=1661189702; bh=LZt4EKW2Klj6HswzcAhuLRqO+KGezqgdN643l6Y4ioE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=l+fH5hxu/zaQqAJKbNMZ9Nf0CpAuK+rlYGBnom8QOROjy/XPzxtZlbeCVKhDLgNnV sQLXQ2uPR+JtbbGQsQwn8GrQ37dGN+3omNW3QUBED8gzmMptjwUmr2PMTgjDqta9OL 1mbgdNU5xTc6QQnzDmW3EbVfruZEOjar1gL9KlJSbJm/9tgOaM6bo7rCqqMUN/gu3Y DLlILDsEx5po5LGy/uyxI/gK0SMz7AMnPC1SqCvcK18dYmcdu+C2OYkr03vJPmk5WJ sjhapDwHu92nTf3EsfreAUqm3wkySCtZRCyuBVcKWNYVZCqndmg4OANuWFjlw97QiV nQpTCzIvtlYUA== Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:17:03 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Adam Manzanares Cc: "alison.schofield@intel.com" , "vishal.l.verma@intel.com" , "ira.weiny@intel.com" , "widawsk@kernel.org" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Replace HDM decoder granularity magic numbers Message-ID: <20220822171703.sfizbmn6retpxggi@offworld> References: <20220822170510.125082-1-a.manzanares@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220822170510.125082-1-a.manzanares@samsung.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20220429 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, Adam Manzanares wrote: >When reviewing the CFMWS parsing code that deals with the HDM decoders, >I noticed a couple of magic numbers. This commit replaces these magic numbers >with constants defined by the CXL 2.0 specification. Please use 3.0 spec :) Actually the whole drivers/cxl/* could use updating the comments for 3.0. >Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares >--- > drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h >index f680450f0b16..ba3a66b5b9cd 100644 >--- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h >+++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h >@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ > #define CXL_HDM_DECODER0_SKIP_LOW(i) CXL_HDM_DECODER0_TL_LOW(i) > #define CXL_HDM_DECODER0_SKIP_HIGH(i) CXL_HDM_DECODER0_TL_HIGH(i) > >+/* HDM decoder control register constants CXL 2.0 8.2.5.12.7 */ This now becomes 8.2.4.19.7. >+#define CXL_DECODER_MIN_GRANULARITY 256 >+#define CXL_DECODER_MAX_GRANULARITY_ORDER 6 Considering there is a single user, I don't think we need to add the CXL_DECODER_MAX_GRANULARITY_ORDER. And if a new one is added it would be better to keep symmetry (bytes) and just do CXL_DECODER_MAX_GRANULARITY, but that's probably the reason why it doesn't exist in the first place. >+ > static inline int cxl_hdm_decoder_count(u32 cap_hdr) > { > int val = FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_COUNT_MASK, cap_hdr); >@@ -71,9 +75,9 @@ static inline int cxl_hdm_decoder_count(u32 cap_hdr) > /* Encode defined in CXL 2.0 8.2.5.12.7 HDM Decoder Control Register */ > static inline int cxl_to_granularity(u16 ig, unsigned int *val) > { >- if (ig > 6) >+ if (ig > CXL_DECODER_MAX_GRANULARITY_ORDER) > return -EINVAL; >- *val = 256 << ig; >+ *val = CXL_DECODER_MIN_GRANULARITY << ig; > return 0; > } > >@@ -96,7 +100,7 @@ static inline int cxl_to_ways(u8 eniw, unsigned int *val) > > static inline int granularity_to_cxl(int g, u16 *ig) > { >- if (g > SZ_16K || g < 256 || !is_power_of_2(g)) >+ if (g > SZ_16K || g < CXL_DECODER_MIN_GRANULARITY || !is_power_of_2(g)) Looks good. Thanks, Davidlohr