Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANXV_XwgZMCGXijfoUyZ9+KyM6Rgeqiq-sCfubyj_16d-2CN=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220815013317.26121-1-dmitrii.bundin.a@gmail.com> <CAKwvOdnnSAozX8bQ9HeSw12BV9OjpzyDmXk_BGczjVVQNN+7tQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANXV_Xw2wzwDdJkyV1nHPQm2JTt48SLrNc7YwrfcxOwuFA-z3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKwvOdkiq_byi1QeCvSGb2fd+0AJ1k9WNnsHJMeaaQcPRy1Wxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkiq_byi1QeCvSGb2fd+0AJ1k9WNnsHJMeaaQcPRy1Wxg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:36:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkPwbD-c0V-up2Ufzb-Uh7LLyD12X0FKeBa=hn+cSPA9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add debug level and macro defs options
To:     Dmitrii Bundin <dmitrii.bundin.a@gmail.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@riseup.net>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> > So it seems like a reasonable choice to provide a debug info
> > level config that would explicitly set the level without relying on
> > implicits. The default value of the config is set to -g2 to not change
> > the build behavior that was before introducing the option. And it
> > works for both older and newer versions of GCC/Clang in the same way.
> > The benefits of the -g1 option are indeed questionable except that it
> > produces an image with ~20% less in size.
>
> Until there's a concrete need, YAGNI.

Or add -g1 to CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers