Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:53:49 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Conor.Dooley@microchip.com
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        palmer@dabbelt.com, sboyd@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        Hugh.Breslin@microchip.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        Daire.McNamara@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: clk: document PolarFire SoC fabric
 clocks
Message-ID: <20220822215349.GA913400-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20220822112928.2727437-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
 <20220822112928.2727437-3-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
 <1661197242.557172.413609.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org>
 <92e15fa9-65f4-1dea-48eb-f3afbea5d3f4@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <92e15fa9-65f4-1dea-48eb-f3afbea5d3f4@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 07:44:20PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 22/08/2022 20:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:29:25 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> On PolarFire SoC there are 4 PLL/DLL blocks, located in each of the
> >> ordinal corners of the chip, which our documentation refers to as
> >> "Clock Conditioning Circuitry". PolarFire SoC is an FPGA, these are
> >> highly configurable & many of the input clocks are optional.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-ccc.yaml    | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-ccc.yaml
> >>
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> Heh, been waiting for this one all day. Messed up squashing commits
> before sending v2... fixed locally & I'll respin later in the week.
> I tried to mark it "changes required" in patchwork so you'd not waste
> time on it but I think that got reverted?

Could have. The CI job messes with the state and then I do, and my 
scripts don't expect the state changing underneath it. Most users don't 
have PW accounts.

Don't worry, I don't spend much time on failing patches.

Rob