Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <02daa3d6-2847-d7e0-e23e-411076c6d4db@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:06:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] tracing: Suppress sparse warnings
 triggered by is_signed_type()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
References: <20220821000737.328590235@goodmis.org>
 <20220821000844.510643400@goodmis.org>
 <CAHk-=wjsxu782N0P+oMu35N7rJAOeh3buQFWJaZHZTNmVSB=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5700ac75-f6a9-877e-4011-9b314f12b5ab@acm.org>
 <CAHk-=wjqkWEr0MRO5hWuBoTDgNUj4qQK8V_Y36et=61mdPztJw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjqkWEr0MRO5hWuBoTDgNUj4qQK8V_Y36et=61mdPztJw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 22/08/2022 20.45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:20 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that it's better that sparse sees the same code as what is used to
>> build the kernel. However, I do not agree that the patch above is a solution.
>> Sparse reports a warning for the suggested definition above of is_signed_type()
>> because the new definition tries to use the less-than (<) operator to compare
>> two __bitwise types.
> 
> Argh. I forgot that part. It wasn't just the cast that warned, it was
> the compare too.
> 
> But we did have a sparse fix for it, didn't we? That fix required that
> the '< (type)1' cast be changed to '<= (type)0' iirc, and a patch to
> sparse, but it at least avoided the problem.

Heh. I originally wrote the comparison "< (t)1" instead of "< (t)0" to
avoid a -Wtype-limits warning when applied to unsigned types - yeah
yeah, the kernel isn't built with that, but it's a nice macro to
copy-paste to other projects, and sometimes people do explicitly enable
-Wtype-limits to manually go through some, and then it's nice to not
have tons of false positives from this macro.

But of course <1 is the same as <=0, and we can indeed spell it that way
without triggering Wtype-limits. So if that can help with also silencing
sparse, ack from me on that part.

Rasmus