Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756257AbXFLXnu (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:43:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753696AbXFLXnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:43:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41902 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752377AbXFLXnm (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:43:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:39 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: fix placement of inline keyword. Message-ID: <20070612234239.GB20229@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel References: <20070612233035.GA24146@redhat.com> <20070612233842.GJ3588@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070612233842.GJ3588@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 25 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:38:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:30:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > gcc gets whiney about the placement of 'inline' at some warning levels. > >... > > Since most of them are in C files, can you remove these when you are at it? I'm not that motivated. I did these to reduce some warning noise a while back. I just wanted to toss this out there before I dropped it on the floor. If it gets applied, great, if not, I'm not going to be too bothered. In many cases, there are lots of other inlines in those drivers too, so it's a bigger job than the obvious fix that I did. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/