Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755954AbXFMDga (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753172AbXFMDgV (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:21 -0400 Received: from smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.220]:22183 "HELO smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752611AbXFMDgU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VSilKiDMk1Kn8yUYq3uyh/RxYOAZeG1Vh02hq/pRUY66O5WQRKBBqX7surzsfsUC58ypg1Yya7J/jY27FrW/zR8Q7WYE6tZWKf6oQCZIINC6KxJKrFlnrLO8J9cXrN2yjPRHcKR2xyw+8ciSg3N/heiU3LJG3HBNna6vCU2OvDA= ; X-YMail-OSG: WoM2b1AVM1nkonLs1IiJEYG1GwGeSOsvcTCvwx0d2KaRKazFLdRm1gF4DSPSQX7taO7rkHcYJQ-- Message-ID: <466F6630.2050207@yahoo.com.au> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:36:16 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Steigerwald CC: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular References: <466B45D3.3020104@gmail.com> (sfid-20070612_171643_519639_3A5C9A70) <200706121925.02286.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <200706121925.02286.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1398 Lines: 35 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2007 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > > Hi Linus! > > >>Ehh.. It was tested extensively by lots of people. It was in -mm for a >>while, and yes, there have been tons of people testing both. I've >>followed it, and it seems fair to say that yes, Ingo took a lot of >>ideas from SD, but CFS seems to have gotten more people involved, and >>we had several people compare the two, and CFS was generally better. > > > Well actually I did not see that general result yet. I have seen quite > some testings and quite some reports on the ck patch mailinglist also > where in favor of SD. If it matters I will collect those, but I think > Ingo already did include most of them in his summary. I'd just like to say that last time I tested CFS it was very slow on context switching. I don't know if this has been improved, but I think it should be. I'm not talking about context switching with heaps of tasks, but about lmbench 2-task ping pongs and such. Also it used pretty small timeslices to achieve interactivity, which didn't seem like a good idea. I wonder if that's been fixed? -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/