Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758213AbXFMM2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:28:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757537AbXFMM2b (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:28:31 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:40851 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757524AbXFMM2a (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:28:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:28:23 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Christian Leber , kernel list Subject: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep Message-ID: <20070613122823.GA2390@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070518213701.GA810@core> <20070611120034.f6d972de.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1181601771.5064.2.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <200706121411.56016.rjw@sisk.pl> <1181697460.4910.7.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070613082448.GH13747@elf.ucw.cz> <1181734353.5012.12.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1181734353.5012.12.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1318 Lines: 33 Hi! > > > Ok. I'll take Pavel's silence as agreement too. I'll be a little slow > > > (as usual, nowadays!), but will try to get it done next week. I think I > > > can in clear conscience do it on Redhat time if I don't manage it > > > beforehand. > > > > Well, everyone wants it so what can I do... Stefan basically posted 3 > > liner to do that, and that one will probably work... so just test it. > > As he admitted, it's a quick and dirty hack. I'd like to try something > nicer. Well, his hack + rename one variable and there's one very nice solution. > > Oh, and please keep the macro, so it can be moved around .S file for > > finding out where it crashes. > > Are there other points you'd like to nominate? It would defeat the logic > for implementing a nice interface if you still have to recompile your > kernel to test beeping in another place. Just before entering C would be another interesting point. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/