Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c62649f0-2be1-459c-bfa5-4c94a3e4300f@smile.fr>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:29:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix reference imbalance in
 ti_find_clock_provider
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc:     linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
References: <63d9211f-d5ce-562e-358a-50f26c7caf35@siemens.com>
 <20220819212337.AECB9C433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
From:   Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20220819212337.AECB9C433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

Le 19/08/2022 à 23:23, Stephen Boyd a écrit :
> Quoting Jan Kiszka (2022-08-08 15:26:58)
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>
>> When a clock is found via clock-output-names, we need to reference it
>> explicitly to match of_find_node_by_name behavior. Failing to do so
>> causes warnings like this:
>>
> 
> Is this superseeded by
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621091118.33930-1-tony@atomide.com?

I noticed the same issue and tested separately with both patches.

Indeed, this patch is not needed anymore with "[PATCH] clk: ti: Fix missing
of_node_get() ti_find_clock_provider()" applied.

Best regards,
Romain