Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp3904317rwa; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:12:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4Uz9TDa1uPSra/Rdcd/gzHqhdlx3AZG51dKcVZsBLWOhDyOj6ojxdYMLIXk2hkF+rJwKzS X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2499:b0:440:942a:40c2 with SMTP id q25-20020a056402249900b00440942a40c2mr4918746eda.37.1661281969055; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:12:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661281969; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mIh7f2rzi5Kxy7HtnWzwF7Y5fZIBZFUbecQs3dIasp8n1xh3afBmqyhvAfaCr17O3q kd/TWsZjlzM6ES3Fltlt6Vk5AgwG/4vzHRodPsQ3et2AYgwm9HcvynbAibDSi/5xl6mh g1WM5zyYruFENokzN5haZfILTz8330p96gnWPXpvt+RGpPkhNzgCeMgES2SfySAmSc3M 0QEiyep0OqXcCVquacMvdfgB6V1XvP9n8+O+OIdm46B/NwZ7KwRzkoI5UMeBGj01tHS3 iXN568lWOKxFX3qroez4yvCNTah4MR2aHmOp4rH7hrM0uOAnGZfu6Gfh5KWbuDc2vK+t LnXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=oHXFYOeJbCcJc6Cno/6cCQNiT2P+Wimf0wvr0cB/Qxo=; b=QAJOp0V8XNePAA6tyPtnBYhzIVD5U/BYDXl0Jp9wzYavuhOjLQt7GkYzGfhhDi12ym tLQe0zxJ66TdDP7TmZSaWinEI2+2nbSqXSNbhmkkHbMkgtEOMS/9VEbk0XfoQOuLqPtJ ePPVCNtjeJsvnujDs3KvI3V5NAdTHh6OXcfQ3pR4NK9+r3MjYObIzOh92R1iBy+4tV4G CwNBplovNgmu7NLStpX33nBwiddILRIruuPxmtTygC6xUmlq2aFYC5qUkx7UcFdHLXaf aHTIBAQGFusAxmtM61NYELPKPL6x8GY6L+6WpipnPM8lE98Jh/d/7syE0LNkkTwbZksd NwfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=C9zBoc5P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q27-20020a50c35b000000b0043e5ca9a0e2si2016546edb.628.2022.08.23.12.12.22; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=C9zBoc5P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229847AbiHWTI3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:08:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38644 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231272AbiHWTIJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:08:09 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F0C13492A; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680B26160B; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A80C433D7; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:44:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661276661; bh=Ul5bZ380er40qNxMbPejlJJeqU3zD3OVNwa3ZFt/HIo=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=C9zBoc5PKmp58NcyygnC6xcVGC6VM2MA3uszmJexg+uHCcrbJ0MX1lMzFwmLesHlz FyEHsjikk6au2Q51Ryztu++WlzbTLWFOQttW01f5sdl4u/w6qhKnP37jnTixRrp9FL zlq6bnHQk34Qgdy37OdQ2jU+xBnqn11n9AE4Gda2LQWQ+OWI/yOQntH6CxrgHvYo29 eF24dMainibdHMsjSWGg2yLcrDh2Th11zIOur+y7mpvgEm5aPFCPppIsgcelHHE1Kw KaPt9GTdxxXJp6kjj4bwGYco5nwDZXlWK+ftIpqXKpQy+GcyhRDCpxBQmjl7OmtQUE yzhWCDDAbKSaw== Received: by mail-yw1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-33387bf0c4aso398390557b3.11; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0SAp8HRqPvHP51DW/A8/QZsbSioXKA6PT4PMd34X3/PeIpSjTu /Yx0FVBYNfx0s2aLXoZ3wSHXfLaufIT/aIEGJkA= X-Received: by 2002:a81:63c3:0:b0:323:ce27:4e4d with SMTP id x186-20020a8163c3000000b00323ce274e4dmr27052114ywb.472.1661276660744; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220817092140.4252-1-xupengfei@nfschina.com> In-Reply-To: <20220817092140.4252-1-xupengfei@nfschina.com> From: Song Liu Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:44:09 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] md/raid5: Fix spelling mistakes in comments To: XU pengfei Cc: linux-raid , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:21 AM XU pengfei wrote: > > Fix spelling of 'waitting' in comments. > > Signed-off-by: XU pengfei Applied to md-next. Thanks, Song > --- > drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c > index f4e1cc1ece43..058d82e7fa13 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c > @@ -1327,9 +1327,9 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log, > * superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either > * directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold > * reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with > - * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting > - * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim > - * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So > + * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting > + * for all IO finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim > + * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig mutex. So > * there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock. > * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex > */ > -- > 2.18.2 >