Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 06:22:59 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
Cc:     Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= <mkoutny@suse.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel@openvz.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, shakeelb@google.com,
        songmuchun@bytedance.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: adjust memcg for new cgroup allocations
Message-ID: <YwT+4zHz2gUWnI5S@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <62188f37-f816-08e9-cdd5-8df23131746d@openvz.org>
 <45a04b75-d61b-4c7a-7169-c971995a6049@openvz.org>
 <20220817091728.GA23229@blackbody.suse.cz>
 <Yv0aMqMIafD7cOQX@slm.duckdns.org>
 <b64759d9-e183-99a2-3ec5-9241035eca69@openvz.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b64759d9-e183-99a2-3ec5-9241035eca69@openvz.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 03:04:31PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> I would like to properly handle cgroup1 case too.
> To do it we can enable accounting for new 'struct cgroup' objects, 
> and bind them to memcg of creator task.

I'm not sure it'd be a good idea to introduce two different behaviors for
handling the same thing. I'd just leave cgroup1 as-is.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun