Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:21:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:21:36 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:60828 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:21:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 20:21:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011203.202130.118628301.davem@redhat.com> To: manfred@colorfullife.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3C0BDC33.6E18C815@colorfullife.com> In-Reply-To: <3C0BDC33.6E18C815@colorfullife.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Manfred Spraul Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 21:10:27 +0100 Which other runtime checks are possible? Tests for correct _irq usage are not possible, several drivers use disable_irq(). Keep track of how many locks are being held at once, and check if it is zero at switch_to() time. You can also do this to measure things like max number of locks held at once and other statistics. I added the first bit to sparc64 while hunting down a bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/