Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:22:47 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
        Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirer@linaro.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Simplify some error message
Message-ID: <20220823192247.GA1781852@p14s>
References: <6b9343c2688117a340661d8ee491c2962c54a09a.1659736936.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6b9343c2688117a340661d8ee491c2962c54a09a.1659736936.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 12:02:32AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so
> there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the
> message.
> 
> While at it, remove 'ret' that is mostly useless.
> 
> Fixes: 2df7062002d0 ("remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 14 +++++---------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>

Applied.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 38383e7de3c1..7cc4fd207e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,6 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>  	struct mbox_client *cl;
> -	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -659,18 +658,15 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	cl->rx_callback = imx_rproc_rx_callback;
>  
>  	priv->tx_ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, "tx");
> -	if (IS_ERR(priv->tx_ch)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->tx_ch);
> -		return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, ret,
> -				     "failed to request tx mailbox channel: %d\n", ret);
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->tx_ch))
> +		return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->tx_ch),
> +				     "failed to request tx mailbox channel\n");
>  
>  	priv->rx_ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, "rx");
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->rx_ch)) {
>  		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rx_ch);
> -		return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, ret,
> -				     "failed to request rx mailbox channel: %d\n", ret);
> +		return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->rx_ch),
> +				     "failed to request rx mailbox channel\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>