Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:59:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:59:21 -0500 Received: from slc815.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.6.53]:51209 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:59:12 -0500 To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Michael Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <200011141459.IAA413471@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> <3A117311.8DC02909@holly-springs.nc.us> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 17 Nov 2000 17:58:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: Daniel Phillips's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:10:43 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips writes: > Actually, I was planning on doing on putting in a hack to do something > like that: calculate a checksum after every buffer data update and check > it after write completion, to make sure nothing scribbled in the buffer > in the interim. This would also pick up some bad memory problems. Be very careful that this just applies to metadata. For normal data this is a valid case. Weird but valid. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/