Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753547AbXFNGQ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:16:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750930AbXFNGQw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:16:52 -0400 Received: from barikada.upol.cz ([158.194.242.200]:50130 "EHLO barikada.upol.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbXFNGQv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:16:51 -0400 To: Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Diego Calleja , Chuck Ebbert , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21) In-Reply-To: References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <200704291849.23197.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070429173725.GB30248@one.firstfloor.org> Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department. User-Agent: jed (x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian) X-Mailer: slrn Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:29:14 +0200 Message-Id: From: Oleg Verych Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2463 Lines: 64 * Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel * Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:50:22 -0700 (PDT) * From: Linus Torvalds > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> Besides the primary point of bug tracking is not to be friendly >> to someone, but to (a) fix the bugs and (b) know how many bugs >> there for a given release. Any replacement would need to solve >> this problem too. >> >> Email does not solve it as far as I can see. > > Email fixes a _lot_ more bugs than bugzilla does. > > End of story. I don't think anybody who cannot accept that UNDENIABLE FACT > should even participate in this discussion. Wake up and look at all the > bugs we fix - most of them have never been in bugzilla. > > That's a FACT. > > Don't go around ignoring reality. I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no idea how it has ended (wiki? hand-mailing?). Just two general questions to Adrian. 1) You was maintainer of the woody backports, isn't it[0]? Why you didn't proposed (used) Debian's BTS as alternative to bugzilla, and how you did your regression tracking? What exactly doesn't fit? Full control by e-mail, comprehensive management, ML handling/redirection, tagging, sorting, searching? Finally, reportbug tool and web-inteface? 2) Your decision to stop activity, was that with debian because Sarge was release with known security hole in the kernel[1]? I'm just wonder. [0] google: "woody backports Adrian Bunk" [1] Message-ID: <20070331194728.GA31853@powerlinux.fr> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel:27730 [Just take your news readers and have fun with Gmane!] [For those, who don't know what it is -- web :] Archived-At: --*-- Unfortunately this message is from a man, who was punished in very unfair manner by "fellow developers". I'm not trying to rise this issue (sorry, if i'm trolling), just want to say, that life can be very unfair, when some wrong people are in power... Message-ID: <20070529053026.GA28352@powerlinux.fr> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.debian.devel.project:12330 Archived-At: ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/