Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754305AbXFNIrR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752021AbXFNIrF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:47:05 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:39308 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbXFNIrF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:47:05 -0400 To: holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, akpm@osdl.org, gregkh@suse.de, mtk-manpages@gmx.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages References: <1181747217.29512.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17542.1181753455@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1181758277.26375.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:47:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1181758277.26375.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:11:17 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 643 Lines: 19 Hi, holzheu writes: > If the information is to big for the printk itself, because you would > need 10 lines to explain what happened, wouldn't it be good to have a > place where to put that information? I think if a message really has to be 10 lines long to be clear then it should just be 10 lines long. The keyword is "really". Example: oops. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/