Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp523341rwe; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6UKm+HA23N+M+HIlNqWtIDcoUv551HyhVUEd7NzT2mZzwEkqcufilTQLZZSSIU2DnZ+CQp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1215:b0:448:1431:465e with SMTP id c21-20020a056402121500b004481431465emr169502edw.395.1661530268736; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661530268; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MFs4GTF3UomNMlM+mV7FLh6i7EaCbFmwJCK07mcFBXw77fq9iWNdnBq0zfZ7fPRXYG KSE9EUG3FNgVtS4bkoOfAvSm0NpohHBZkItXwnbqRjGD8WKxDNWPao64UxtjHULDlGoD 4GhlaRuFS6rutK/VdYP2clutipOqVBhMmwLvGnH/EMY8VCHmpzT4+lYiDF6brwwmY8Ll gcwt6k2Hf5NcGyolLLsS6EYYMttgznAySu/xRg+bQ4n8xnxKil85JCyyXm5beQ7qTj77 TEsKjFGV1fCiDx36auCbUipmAP8GbWERS3uR2h81UgsxA6Xe9iAhdPs2JqFiAKz5lb7i HUQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=L0H2b2GPKZYIuMR6iWTYOgB5/UtrkJG2fxwjDyQeFtE=; b=TYovySeZdXUwEONfdYRwXDCxz98YHmK2vu65PGduQllip3KdMNvE3GgmY6VenR5kw8 L278RHkiVXLFm5EAnVT7mt7fJYYyr85TBSKHPRkWS2mT2cuX6h5seYpDa+2sag5kjkud B9/ygDWrsaMQ1VAXE1egpkcXxHzz4qYR0ifwLhLqTQ/01v+O4IsYBg0fzVWdd/Z4Waer XO/hDscGJCY84AQO980WGJIaRRcqAzAlN0hKnB2nsc7WIVnTb1ecB9XdhyduTy/1eOsH KBn5W26mOedrLZzFnsnvxRhew2AB0TBPYWonleX89OhOISHJKm2G1yN2KXV3jF6UZRbW D0wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ntlSXkWi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ho34-20020a1709070ea200b0073cd3a15f42si1861975ejc.394.2022.08.26.09.10.40; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ntlSXkWi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243854AbiHZQGh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:06:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229754AbiHZQGf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:06:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BE0D3E43 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id bs25so2345482wrb.2 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=L0H2b2GPKZYIuMR6iWTYOgB5/UtrkJG2fxwjDyQeFtE=; b=ntlSXkWi8J2ryefHCTq55BPnbPb2Tas1Jil+sp/Cx9DrtNvaySXbCSUKAFZ1+1uSXJ g8aVWdh4PfNRBWp6P/clzaRfOi8H1idIkp7YVevW1l4LbLHBgZntSjkJthdEwQHUiswo xQOEuPgF9GzCZ2/4A4/kr9nwOIlkk90esnB0tOCt9Kq806CqKx0F5uB7WMSAQxMpEDkQ Tvs4+3fV4fry9twJESAgmRw7qMrZ9Bh/isM+rGLIEt+i0rJn//YBNlQkqTt9c3CpTBKD tomYLfnOJ8HJD8zWgtOV9P9d4WH/L+6bUb9+YWkdZYYRCkKJL+IZRFJsajsi8aO+BDg1 Tkew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=L0H2b2GPKZYIuMR6iWTYOgB5/UtrkJG2fxwjDyQeFtE=; b=QAiDZl9/ldKy90G4f6F+5zoMRz7UW0rZ/mOMEpj1wQ7qDqUvlGyqXX/DD07xXg8ozi afcTw0zI+2HXQ2c8W2aQO+TdwxLCjoi9ad2rSy3Nz/+N/QFeFd1EkPzf79BMpzZdrnDj mNzytjsRCpr+UiQ+IWsvnQ6M139euSYI92C0yAeKHEEwPkYQ6kwwn/LFd2k15sxdl+3x ssI+mNdaFy4mMKWVFHl7UPSyEs1XVJL0DE07GXYqpMi0SyUFpKBclq3pFLfYW3D/ef3x 2ccQk2+TDhd1KsAg37+QAuQu53AVGJY6rDUqvt8sWRGwAjZGT+VerFrW5itNMqbhLvOC Qg7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1LViuSIH8/SxxIDpcnC+BIbvbXsjRPTJ2HTqPmzWGYHcGM9Lyx Adw4ttvPoxAr/OLNRvTp0ZFehBJcI2Cte6ye6kP3Lw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1ac9:b0:220:7f40:49e3 with SMTP id i9-20020a0560001ac900b002207f4049e3mr219844wry.40.1661529992826; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:06:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220824153901.488576-1-irogers@google.com> <20220824153901.488576-17-irogers@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ian Rogers Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:06:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/18] perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida?= , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , Weiguo Li , Athira Rajeev , Thomas Richter , Ravi Bangoria , Dario Petrillo , Hewenliang , yaowenbin , Wenyu Liu , Song Liu , Andrii Nakryiko , Dave Marchevsky , Leo Yan , Kim Phillips , Pavithra Gurushankar , Alexandre Truong , Quentin Monnet , William Cohen , Andres Freund , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Colin Ian King , James Clark , Fangrui Song , Stephane Eranian , Kajol Jain , Alexey Bayduraev , Riccardo Mancini , Andi Kleen , Masami Hiramatsu , Zechuan Chen , Jason Wang , Christophe JAILLET , Remi Bernon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:12 AM Adrian Hunter wrote: > > On 24/08/22 18:38, Ian Rogers wrote: > > Add annotations to describe lock behavior. Add unlocks so that mutexes > > aren't conditionally held on exit from perf_sched__replay. Add an exit > > variable so that thread_func can terminate, rather than leaving the > > threads blocked on mutexes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers > > --- > > tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > > index 7e4006d6b8bc..b483ff0d432e 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ struct perf_sched { > > const char *time_str; > > struct perf_time_interval ptime; > > struct perf_time_interval hist_time; > > + volatile bool thread_funcs_exit; > > }; > > > > /* per thread run time data */ > > @@ -633,31 +634,34 @@ static void *thread_func(void *ctx) > > prctl(PR_SET_NAME, comm2); > > if (fd < 0) > > return NULL; > > -again: > > - ret = sem_post(&this_task->ready_for_work); > > - BUG_ON(ret); > > - mutex_lock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > > - mutex_unlock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > > > > - cpu_usage_0 = get_cpu_usage_nsec_self(fd); > > + while (!sched->thread_funcs_exit) { > > + ret = sem_post(&this_task->ready_for_work); > > + BUG_ON(ret); > > + mutex_lock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > > + mutex_unlock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > > > > - for (i = 0; i < this_task->nr_events; i++) { > > - this_task->curr_event = i; > > - perf_sched__process_event(sched, this_task->atoms[i]); > > - } > > + cpu_usage_0 = get_cpu_usage_nsec_self(fd); > > > > - cpu_usage_1 = get_cpu_usage_nsec_self(fd); > > - this_task->cpu_usage = cpu_usage_1 - cpu_usage_0; > > - ret = sem_post(&this_task->work_done_sem); > > - BUG_ON(ret); > > + for (i = 0; i < this_task->nr_events; i++) { > > + this_task->curr_event = i; > > + perf_sched__process_event(sched, this_task->atoms[i]); > > + } > > > > - mutex_lock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > > - mutex_unlock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > > + cpu_usage_1 = get_cpu_usage_nsec_self(fd); > > + this_task->cpu_usage = cpu_usage_1 - cpu_usage_0; > > + ret = sem_post(&this_task->work_done_sem); > > + BUG_ON(ret); > > > > - goto again; > > + mutex_lock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > > + mutex_unlock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > > + } > > + return NULL; > > } > > > > static void create_tasks(struct perf_sched *sched) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(sched->start_work_mutex) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(sched->work_done_wait_mutex) > > { > > struct task_desc *task; > > pthread_attr_t attr; > > @@ -687,6 +691,8 @@ static void create_tasks(struct perf_sched *sched) > > } > > > > static void wait_for_tasks(struct perf_sched *sched) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(sched->work_done_wait_mutex) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(sched->start_work_mutex) > > { > > u64 cpu_usage_0, cpu_usage_1; > > struct task_desc *task; > > @@ -738,6 +744,8 @@ static void wait_for_tasks(struct perf_sched *sched) > > } > > > > static void run_one_test(struct perf_sched *sched) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(sched->work_done_wait_mutex) > > + EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(sched->start_work_mutex) > > { > > u64 T0, T1, delta, avg_delta, fluct; > > > > @@ -3309,11 +3317,15 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched) > > print_task_traces(sched); > > add_cross_task_wakeups(sched); > > > > + sched->thread_funcs_exit = false; > > create_tasks(sched); > > printf("------------------------------------------------------------\n"); > > for (i = 0; i < sched->replay_repeat; i++) > > run_one_test(sched); > > > > + sched->thread_funcs_exit = true; > > + mutex_unlock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > > + mutex_unlock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > > I think you still need to wait for the threads to exit before > destroying the mutexes. This is a pre-existing issue and beyond the scope of this patch set. Thanks, Ian > > return 0; > > } > > >