Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp780978rwe; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR567KzwY+L/wPyUxVj7BUMir1NFON1vTTtYNAKRS/fb1e/FROPL7Fq5bgnatpDLpiMUS/SR X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3c49:b0:1fb:1e12:a105 with SMTP id pm9-20020a17090b3c4900b001fb1e12a105mr6256327pjb.171.1661549556707; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:32:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661549556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xD2/mpMeL6+gnsFK99/Qcja2mk2HksPVRlVTT4T1htfsk17aHpzciG+anm9B4drx80 BBOP8U4ZVwAMUJL0f4oF26oxgOrmBW+22CXf8VBhy7js1UfyFZMcNYA3Ov9+pj7I1B2H xdQwA5jJMreOqB81Mt9LY6I9FYsuE1ZO0dYByyo83eU80QKPm0EZoCzIX/t0HG9F9wRF mJNp5/Gwb6lVTbX+Gwz2OK3YIo6LzVrKajmR2NfJqzhjApCMSTht/jwAfCddwxbYXRGK QyofaX93MQSn95aIbCR+90BcFXG9BiWzeuB3P6NRmcSs3c6ai/eZ7Xe8YRYiF+xGZ3qO T0rQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=+sFY7D0l2mnCR+yBDf+opIgpmAA2WEbHZKwcSvQkuz0=; b=nxC3dVl5nwcSGQX89XKSPYT+Kuj/N8Q2mp6n0Z7Wslwc0E9BLQPzZGBtucAHmVSEMf /P+Kxm2LfGz3Ge0Rlwf+nyhKUVZ8/v9l+14ZkRBX6/awSaQ+W6ysSPc6vmJVXtWlzjf8 eCZnrhf5XmN2pKdD6mXUz/f31RIUQIHjtlRkAVMgWCPwscMRPFUe9fN2wf4B9BBkW2o1 Fo9u/p0etZ0/CXNfcVXnlfNtApYCY699rtN6iS1sbxzBfO+EMJ9QzZrYlksR36V4nqXK KJaJOu4dszK6HUof5uJIllDBXseOeVOrbGdPTS/6FL66GaaVHOJBTZOvmWOvFmFNnibW vj/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g11-20020a170902d5cb00b001708af3828fsi2309177plh.62.2022.08.26.14.32.23; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239972AbiHZUsZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:48:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52050 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232426AbiHZUsW (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:48:22 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-f41.google.com (mail-oa1-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E67BD1E3C; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-11d2dcc31dbso3541247fac.7; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=+sFY7D0l2mnCR+yBDf+opIgpmAA2WEbHZKwcSvQkuz0=; b=XZ7s0hXNmEde4ohHK74sH3BCjN8BfQWuAVtuPeoYll6FujPuRx/7MHB46fAzrOANeI cV1m3rpy8yWAcw8d+huZZGtCxQSe9U4c3tB4JgAvZ67g/p+h+/SrqhVJqB348xYEtrrD k2HNPc6avqVRmOfwlDEIUUaArHhDtvqqYaA6p58pNsVxfY4UFi/00D3Bm2f3QfiVwAtm kwrYz1GyRmfbckQy0knBnLbaSvQxw4S6Hkhp1WqlbHXyby8AzK/f6gd+S0srbjo1Ecrd zFbA4Yz5QITn1NTrsDx59C8pAQ4YOtxT6dd14Tn5yCCD4Tx1OMgaEUMHasDMz+r85lOo uCmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1GXVxnN4ULki3E9ut2eLDCsLmzWEu9m5LM0N0zG+FM17vHUhuO RMUIT6M6+QqPxnlcjjq9zQluuXAirghgW4nL3V0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:5b84:b0:10c:d1fa:2f52 with SMTP id em4-20020a0568705b8400b0010cd1fa2f52mr2736185oab.92.1661546900488; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220824153901.488576-1-irogers@google.com> <20220824153901.488576-17-irogers@google.com> <5a0b4083-084a-56b3-a6a1-0fad1100a316@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5a0b4083-084a-56b3-a6a1-0fad1100a316@intel.com> From: Namhyung Kim Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/18] perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Thomas Gleixner , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida?= , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , Weiguo Li , Athira Rajeev , Thomas Richter , Ravi Bangoria , Dario Petrillo , Hewenliang , yaowenbin , Wenyu Liu , Song Liu , Andrii Nakryiko , Dave Marchevsky , Leo Yan , Kim Phillips , Pavithra Gurushankar , Alexandre Truong , Quentin Monnet , William Cohen , Andres Freund , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Colin Ian King , James Clark , Fangrui Song , Stephane Eranian , Kajol Jain , Alexey Bayduraev , Riccardo Mancini , Andi Kleen , Masami Hiramatsu , Zechuan Chen , Jason Wang , Christophe JAILLET , Remi Bernon , linux-kernel , linux-perf-users , bpf , llvm@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:36 PM Adrian Hunter wrote: > > On 26/08/22 21:26, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:48 AM Ian Rogers wrote: > >> In the previous code the threads were blocked on mutexes that were > >> stack allocated and the stack memory went away. You are correct to say > >> that to those locks I added an init and destroy call. The lifetime of > >> the mutex was wrong previously and remains wrong in this change. > > > > I think you fixed the lifetime issue with sched->thread_funcs_exit here. > > All you need to do is calling pthread_join() after the mutex_unlock, no? > > Like this maybe: Yeah, but at this point we might want to factor it out as a function like destroy_tasks(). Thanks, Namhyung > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > index b483ff0d432e..8090c1218855 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c > @@ -3326,6 +3326,13 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched) > sched->thread_funcs_exit = true; > mutex_unlock(&sched->start_work_mutex); > mutex_unlock(&sched->work_done_wait_mutex); > + /* Get rid of threads so they won't be upset by mutex destruction */ > + for (i = 0; i < sched->nr_tasks; i++) { > + int err = pthread_join(sched->tasks[i]->thread, NULL); > + > + if (err) > + pr_err("pthread_join() failed for task nr %lu, error %d\n", i, err); > + } > return 0; > }