Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 27 Aug 2022 01:47:48 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
        will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
        dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr,
        akiyks@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Verifying and Optimizing Compact NUMA-Aware Locks on Weak
 Memory Models"
Message-ID: <YwlbpPHzp8tj0Gn0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220826124812.GA3007435@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <YwjzfASTcODOXP1f@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <Ywj+j2kC+5xb6DmO@rowland.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Ywj+j2kC+5xb6DmO@rowland.harvard.edu>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 01:10:39PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:

> >  - some babbling about a missing propagation -- ISTR Linux if stuffed
> >    full of them, specifically we require stores to auto propagate
> >    without help from barriers
> 
> Not a missing propagation; a late one.
> 
> Don't understand what you mean by "auto propagate without help from 
> barriers".

Linux hard relies on:

	CPU0				CPU1

	WRITE_ONCE(foo, 1);		while (!READ_ONCE(foo));

making forward progress.

There were a few 'funny' uarchs that were broken, see for example commit
a30718868915f.