Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:52:33 +0800
From:   Puyou Lu <puyou.lu@gmail.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: do runtime cpu cap check only when
 necessary
Message-ID: <20220829035232.GA13376@dell-PowerEdge-T440>
References: <20220827051328.GA18042@lu-N56VJ>
 <87wnatra83.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <20220828075610.GA30202@lu-N56VJ>
 <87r110qong.wl-maz@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87r110qong.wl-maz@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 06:11:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Well, what you got wrong is that these instructions are stepped over
> two branches when the caps are finalised, and that doesn't appear in
> the disassembly (you need to look at the code that is actually
> executed).
> 
> Now, any optimisation of the sort must be backed by some performance
> numbers. If you can show that this has a meaningful impact on a given
> workload, I'm happy to look into it. But only if you can show that
> data.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Thank you very much for correcting me, and sorry for wasting your time, I
got it now.