Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <283e6be0-748a-9487-d4eb-11e1b18d6427@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:48:47 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw
 lock
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        <bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220827020911.30641-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
 <9498c691-2a85-b9b1-7852-8b362455b840@redhat.com>
From:   shangxiaojing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <9498c691-2a85-b9b1-7852-8b362455b840@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2022/8/29 16:24, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 8/27/22 04:09, Shang XiaoJing wrote:
>
> Why are y'all always setting "-next" to the subject?
i heard that "-next" means prefer to merge into linux-next branch first, 
the subsequent patches from me wont set "-next".
>> As members in sched_dl_entity are independent with dl_bw, move
>> __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
>
> -- Daniel

Thanks,

Shang XiaoJing