Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp3121710rwe; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:16:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4Z+IpUTe2+QyZLCDW4lsV7LGBWwUY9NGxyjfoBZhHkiRjruQ1u4a3d7vf5SfmrjUNoOnBN X-Received: by 2002:a63:90c7:0:b0:42b:6b68:3655 with SMTP id a190-20020a6390c7000000b0042b6b683655mr13632212pge.335.1661778970153; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:16:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661778970; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ttvr91/zZEDt7o8YNOp9pFIlJY8ai2kQFJpNPcQ7s492tRU2WODKteGyvUU0svEe1E 8SxdhkwF75Ae1SbW34c2mBu1v49zBVRaO5sLlO68wCZ7imvsLnFytq7dhTStQT8iHL30 V0wxv5flI2FT+y9QQ6fK2O+CdTgdIBr47LwyvxGrR4HACVhwIt3iMkEKQHZY36uov/+p xlv9ZBPmyd3VzP7UuFE/5NqDAmTkqcLgoQT2UhLjIUKhPcoJ8ZimNxJWEkkIWZ5u30la nl/D5lA5nm9BCWpyw+lWex6FXKiUE988bAkZMmTwX3rmP3QemfkSat+IInFhgSQlGZyf zatw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=2wzFsLYHBSO+bSg9K3lLWWvk30GMleRrtWDuIqbsYXA=; b=FeDSDQYcX+LvFkNrQpvLII34Dj/fJGyFrsMjiqH3qduFVB0omhISY2KP8MJnFhCo9S wvVCHMo5NLrlDK/U4ZcWBpOYx2AJlfAsnwlnIp8L6COnVwVMKB0KVYH3tZ97Qh2tA0nJ DkpiNSUeW6lVzgZJ7iCjeGAsxY5330W+9WmKSigNOf9xNTZtobLVU14JohcUxWXlOBGj Pte3bQl+Uem8gDdQ2GzxCAg7l2sG4XoKXJ15RhsCCcCg/0TaZMW/Nt9m+bLYDS8J9wHC WZDXQr6gx5BvhzBe5VLhvf8of4sjO2tfbnA6khfFHONTlGNfSTplYxGG5Z4qEQ3tp94v d5dQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=M9Rqk2DZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10-20020a056a0024ca00b0053841bc8a61si2976773pfv.14.2022.08.29.06.15.59; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=M9Rqk2DZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230184AbiH2M44 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:56:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48436 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229726AbiH2M4X (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:56:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x54a.google.com (mail-ed1-x54a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::54a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF3067462 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x54a.google.com with SMTP id r11-20020a05640251cb00b004484ec7e3a4so2544934edd.8 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc; bh=2wzFsLYHBSO+bSg9K3lLWWvk30GMleRrtWDuIqbsYXA=; b=M9Rqk2DZbWx+M0j2ZNREBFTuUmUql9FGMSZUdPStSv1BolmPhWMDlNgK+7vyNFFD5J sB4HOcmHm3qjS4OpBDfSzHbX4S4haFyminVHG6seqVv7pn+u3VXdnaVSql4j6aDu2YJ4 cSH8NpoH8lS7T3FrhvZAZAGuJ1yW0fPguBXtAP3lbFS0AQ8qnn+2vyiZZdQUUt6hP70X mHWF5w3tnlLXIWh18vif9ntbngOeROkc7fz5meyo4vV507tjq+y5Rbm7lBpb+t0hM9AT GvVWCnJc8dTM7rD6ATQjIQ+F5pjOp49ZjN9tC1AhYQoO6CRk8fw3MjIF5X/3xRhh0X+x nMnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=2wzFsLYHBSO+bSg9K3lLWWvk30GMleRrtWDuIqbsYXA=; b=au2PX5UgWOuNkFT1WB0WQqny6tt3Y4pi78BKwap1uwr1xA7JgPmBijFAitH5+Erh03 dS0y9tDcEJHxkKphPh1QJf49WY0tVppEUNsNvxqy3XccWmFfCf+4LnEHATNoQqu+d+/R So2HNM9+dPmsuaVxepgH67dzTMHcxYiHhDDjO6ADKQ9WSCKTq67Dx5x+CoMcEnsjtJ01 ji2NMTJRCeX+0snxKOasV82gWfECzS3Z/PngmUj4W2J8f8SBRmrgNwz4eJX126/Zzcbn Ah4gIKsJc+HclyJYE08wCBOnlRGhkWN2/pkP/Wx3HwPJhja/CuIoPCT8OxbvGuJeNhJk Y5kQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2/hpfyUu6oRFVKBFP0LAqeRm1TeFxdOnXZ0MzL9VKwNEbI7sRO zRBoohSS1fqlNUORAsg98Y+KYJYiGg== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:196d:4fc7:fa9c:62e3]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:907:97d3:b0:73d:8b9b:a6c1 with SMTP id js19-20020a17090797d300b0073d8b9ba6c1mr13449067ejc.71.1661777281218; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:47:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog Message-ID: <20220829124719.675715-2-elver@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Dmitry Vyukov , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch interesting corner cases via bug-injection). The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all architectures. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov Acked-by: Ian Rogers --- v3: * Don't use raw_smp_processor_id(). v2: * New patch. --- kernel/events/Makefile | 1 + kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 + 3 files changed, 334 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644 --- a/kernel/events/Makefile +++ b/kernel/events/Makefile @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o +obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic. + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots) \ + do { \ + if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) { \ + kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots, \ + get_test_bp_slots()); \ + } \ + } while (0) + +#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr)) + +#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512 + +static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS]; +static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS]; +static struct task_struct *__other_task; + +static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx) +{ + struct perf_event_attr attr = {}; + + if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS)) + return NULL; + + hw_breakpoint_init(&attr); + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx]; + attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1; + attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW; + return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL); +} + +static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp) +{ + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp))) + return; + if (WARN_ON(!*bp)) + return; + unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp); + *bp = NULL; +} + +static int get_test_bp_slots(void) +{ + static int slots; + + if (!slots) + slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA); + + return slots; +} + +static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]); + test_bps[(*id)++] = bp; +} + +/* + * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free. + * + * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id. + */ +static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip) +{ + for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i) + fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk); + + return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; +} + +static int dummy_kthread(void *arg) +{ + return 0; +} + +static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct task_struct *tsk; + + if (__other_task) + return __other_task; + + tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk)); + __other_task = tsk; + return __other_task; +} + +static int get_test_cpu(int num) +{ + int cpu; + + WARN_ON(num < 0); + + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + if (num-- <= 0) + break; + } + + return cpu; +} + +/* ===== Test cases ===== */ + +static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + int cpu; + + /* Test that CPUs are independent. */ + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx)); + if (!do_continue) + break; + } +} + +static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + /* Test that tasks are independent. */ + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* + * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is + * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent. + */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); +} + +static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3); + + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + + /* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */ + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */ + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx; + int idx = 0; + + TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3); + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2); + /* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */ + tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx; + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + + /* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */ + cpu_idx = idx; + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); + + /* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]); + /* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */ + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + /* Remove it and try again. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); +} + +static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu), + {}, +}; + +static int test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */ + return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0; +} + +static void test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) { + if (test_bps[i]) + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]); + } + + if (__other_task) { + kthread_stop(__other_task); + __other_task = NULL; + } +} + +static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = { + .name = "hw_breakpoint", + .test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases, + .init = test_init, + .exit = test_exit, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver "); diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index bcbe60d6c80c..84309a00f9aa 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2533,6 +2533,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF, or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL. +config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST + bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + depends on KUNIT=y + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting. + + If unsure, say N. + config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help -- 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog