Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp3313286rwe; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:17:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6QzBNMhGz61Dn4ZLVltWqLN27l1GT8DNKb3Meaam5SX11VsufNDg+ugZ4AcwJNLlHm7Www X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cc06:0:b0:440:7258:ad16 with SMTP id q6-20020aa7cc06000000b004407258ad16mr16503185edt.74.1661789820743; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661789820; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0hAAvmVh4KFft2YliQVSzRTYgSkqB9HWy4qhUrA3M2sKkqH2AA6iVlbW1lt9EJUlWy mEtfxDh/bVLVgSKhiW4ixavTgrlRx6mSfvsq7Baxt8KYwtO154TGwWEW0uhcNDT+keni I86OrDfQs5wAjgdGxiB3etXGaQJkMk3za/CEuyv3kmOdP0o9BzgjL2Ca9jO/qtbwYh6u Yw3nZfC7jRt0S89ETSHrSJA7fKsItn7G4zPygCSraEP7dp3cWt2LhARgBNVwtv6535iO lc7ie1kf1mP9XnBXp1mMf6R6Eu22SvaAH02EsyO1yCuJsk7WK9J7w6vtzUAxWxW2c7W3 7r0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject :from:references:cc:to:content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id; bh=lfgCGOJtfhuud64LWPAscR6ETvFbZdGGKqjgo17XIjk=; b=cT5KbV3Q89NZHQJdRm25qY2nxEuQtNCnShan0KyEBAH60/tYWev6fMrsr/EJ8uRfCQ tKOrax7lxpwxyJu1bgzp+FLF9/5iqrCbDXYWGIpjyjA9G6Qm4ORyzO8eP8yWUisZ/axm GZT8qnQHA0y68UvzHeJUHcqBlFhY+1T/ovtUVIwe0QryC0z7ixA9RHuDcVglhUD1lHK2 iS1mNzqYSDSxb6VweGQECj/Ah9fyMm6bb4k5z0KHzveAGkcyBT8N8fg0fa1JAWV+l5SH B9muTBRH10z1jNQre0X7sgR3JTGWwWJ7V8mX97umXTJNwiBrIWkNIjWZ3ixZsMAfQwyU rQ0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp20-20020a170906c15400b0073bc83b838bsi3604985ejc.281.2022.08.29.09.16.34; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230008AbiH2QGx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:06:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51534 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229478AbiH2QGu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:06:50 -0400 Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0638683075; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.146] (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F348477556; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:05:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <0ba12a13-6cc4-5f44-fa06-ead350f819d5@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:06:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Zhiqiang Liu , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: linfeilong , wuguanghao References: <514e5e4b-e7c8-365f-8459-75974c067993@huawei.com> From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: donot need to check return value of xlog_kvmalloc() In-Reply-To: <514e5e4b-e7c8-365f-8459-75974c067993@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/22/22 6:46 AM, Zhiqiang Liu wrote: > > In xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(), xlog_kvmalloc() is called > to alloc memory, which will always return > successfully, so we donot need to check return value. > > Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu I think this is fine. xlog_kvmalloc loops until success, and its other caller does not check the return value. This isn't really strictly a fix (it's harmless) but it "fixes" Fixes: commit 4183e4f27f402 ("xfs: share xattr name and value buffers when logging xattr updates") Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen That said, I think that xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc() also cannot fail, so perhaps its callers don't need checks either? > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c > index 5077a7ad5646..667e151a2bca 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c > @@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc( > */ > nv = xlog_kvmalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_nameval) + > name_len + value_len); > - if (!nv) > - return nv; > > nv->name.i_addr = nv + 1; > nv->name.i_len = name_len;