Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp3732338rwe; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:10:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4LoDYG7mv2chtRTRifECo643Idy60tZhhkBzjloB1FGvM/292nEUTk47SzwFiY2WZRGFyI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9be4:b0:741:480a:387a with SMTP id de36-20020a1709069be400b00741480a387amr8982961ejc.147.1661825442467; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:10:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661825442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RFymkg8rSktzAXeNAcT1EVjiR1KX4suVp9lakQIlVgXVItlFwON2xLud7rGGnTmoq8 6ffGpl56EXgynk4Si5UdaomDeE/wT8D/9y1tEsgsFsPFH1oDus2zqfrXzFjBjbvYxs3y EQh3/AitVEgcN5OajVVjXT1m4PQStshj0Wh0mEsD7SznDkQGty3XWbNFREwjubpKZxrC 1fJzyV8travz8DYmWbKzgoYC7vq2x2WrBK+6jQ1IcM8+6FEYmu4RaFXaflWBgSijv2zR Gp2c2j2KwhhdlAndWrHIdLBRKQLb7AyX/i969U2ovOL8C+e05+i34Y7XQBW8wZBbZaKE XPfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=7ccsdM8TCAB5nVH5MNFh73DdxwCOWkBrEchD0FUWri4=; b=jHeSFIhfZXT+bxqtH/hsqnYYFaJTOBGoOpWpp5ov/WpbKzAGib4dimkHmuczt7JBVj gVUV6cg43KRlXjY14fCzafrQy4bbXd0lE4D+buJI4HoIfZK0wX8NnocrrjzlmrrjNUeh h3D5aUYmlKi94kueYlrfV5u3Qw9X9/aBnjKXio8L24MwLCOba6Ml3yX7SCSbvHxjSCS2 PkNDg1oqzYWy37smtb8PH2s9BOwbYXU/OpnFpBt1GZYG6Zp97gHBEQ3ZMBAbOaF3/7vT cuchPQGxnx6mmGTuPUJVWJEFuCxi3aoiMtxBYfDaqk7Y3mHROU4NJ9LyGY+JgYTcD+NP zp2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=AGGoIj3s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt19-20020a170907729300b0073d7353d1ffsi7722826ejc.860.2022.08.29.19.10.16; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=AGGoIj3s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229892AbiH3Bvb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:51:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33026 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229884AbiH3BvZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:51:25 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0287C32F for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661824282; x=1693360282; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHdeZU3zCE5Y6OYgb7a7NyVSc9y1tganA4G2YOsk2Ec=; b=AGGoIj3suGhDeQu+hQAiJRSFyloEffLBntv2IBubFt/2wjfDimD6vchW 2Dj+CqlL9kkM5z4/aVtuKKxpVW3i8OAEs0aU4MME7yuHw6upxP33YGzvW +wpA3Hi3qfRBLlPBg3ymNMtQUlH6lV1i0InbPS7AAFyVFIPvy5dKkxrKH AZ7JmGmgHrKk2bsbDnR0OerQuU3Y6KHtbNBkjWIhdEPpfqDd+FngOsA8p paTlFuxTB84vr+pY9Y9Zqw6xlr+3MGcF/A/Ff1w3SWlkfCOT1VnY3Kd+f yKjpiyilPmdnBbNKwokfSvZqWYvwx3AQMFg9qpG5SCOXDAP26yGtU+Fxv A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10454"; a="296330181" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,274,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="296330181" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2022 18:51:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,274,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="641167057" Received: from q.bj.intel.com ([10.238.154.102]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2022 18:51:10 -0700 From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Karolina Drobnik , David Hildenbrand , Rebecca Mckeever , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:49:17 +0800 Message-Id: <20220830014925.162718-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220830014925.162718-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> References: <20220830014925.162718-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shaoqin Huang Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region, and fake the other memory region, so it make sure the memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init(). So memblock_double_array() must success. Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 7 +- tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 3 + 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c index 66f46f261e66..c8e201156cdc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c @@ -326,6 +326,87 @@ static int memblock_add_twice_check(void) return 0; } +/* + * A test that tries to add the 129th memory block. + * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the + * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as + * memory.regions. + */ +static int memblock_add_many_check(void) +{ + int i; + void *orig_region; + struct region r = { + .base = SZ_16K, + .size = MEM_SIZE, + }; + phys_addr_t memory_base = SZ_128K; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + + reset_memblock_regions(); + memblock_allow_resize(); + + /* + * Add one valid memory region, this will be choosed to be the memory + * that new memory.regions occupied. + */ + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)get_memory_block_base(), MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, MEM_SIZE); + + for (i = 1; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) { + /* Add some fakes memory region to fulfill the memblock. */ + memblock_add(memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, i + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + + /* Keep the gap so these memory region will not be merged. */ + memory_base += MEM_SIZE * 2; + } + + orig_region = memblock.memory.regions; + + /* This adds the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. */ + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)memory_base, MEM_SIZE); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + /* This is the size used by new memory.regions. Check it. */ + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, PAGE_ALIGN(INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2 * + sizeof(struct memblock_region))); + + /* The base is very small, so it should be insert to the first region. */ + memblock_add(r.base, r.size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].base, r.base); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].size, r.size); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); + + /* + * The current memory.regions is occupying a range of memory that + * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory, + * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure + * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array. + */ + memblock.memory.regions = orig_region; + memblock.memory.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + static int memblock_add_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -339,6 +420,7 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void) memblock_add_overlap_bottom_check(); memblock_add_within_check(); memblock_add_twice_check(); + memblock_add_many_check(); prefix_pop(); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c index 76a8ad818f3a..96fabd96ff31 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ #include #include -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS #define PREFIXES_MAX 15 #define DELIM ": " @@ -77,6 +75,11 @@ void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void) free(memory_block.base); } +void *get_memory_block_base(void) +{ + return memory_block.base; +} + static void usage(const char *prog) { BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(help_opts) != ARRAY_SIZE(long_opts) - 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h index d396e5423a8e..d56af621c543 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include <../selftests/kselftest.h> #define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS /** * ASSERT_EQ(): @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ void reset_memblock_attributes(void); void setup_memblock(void); void dummy_physical_memory_init(void); void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void); +void *get_memory_block_base(void); void parse_args(int argc, char **argv); void test_fail(void); -- 2.34.1