Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:10:42 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move clocks to CPU node
Message-ID: <20220830054042.akj7pf366inelvpo@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1657695140.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20220715160933.GD12197@workstation>
 <20220718015742.uwskqo55qd67jx2w@vireshk-i7>
 <20220801023756.76jswkbwivuntqof@vireshk-i7>
 <20220830032456.z4olnogsyg32vhiz@builder.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220830032456.z4olnogsyg32vhiz@builder.lan>
Precedence: bulk

On 29-08-22, 22:24, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Conceptually, it sounds like a good idea to express the clock feeding
> the CPU clusters, which is controlled by the OSM/EPSS.  But do you
> expect the OPP framework to actually do something with the clock, or
> just to ensure that the relationship is properly described?

No, the OPP core will never try to set the clock rate in your case,
though it will do clk_get().

> FWIW, the possible discrepancy between the requested frequency and the
> actual frequency comes from the fact that OSM/EPSS throttles the cluster
> frequency based on a number of different factors (thermal, voltages
> ...).
> This is reported back to the kernel using the thermal pressure
> interface. It would be quite interesting to see some investigation in
> how efficient the kernel is at making use of this feedback.

-- 
viresh