Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:02:28 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
CC:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <kernel@pengutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] iio: adc: tsc2046: silent spi_device_id warning
Message-ID: <20220830140228.000013ca@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220830110709.2037302-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
References: <20220830110709.2037302-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
        <20220830110709.2037302-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:07:09 +0200
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Add spi_device_id to silent following warning:
>  SPI driver tsc2046 has no spi_device_id for ti,tsc2046e-adc
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> index bbc8b4137b0b1..b9a1fac659d46 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> @@ -761,7 +761,15 @@ static int tsc2046_adc_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!dev_fwnode(dev)) {
> +		const struct spi_device_id *id;
> +
> +		id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
> +		dcfg = (const struct tsc2046_adc_dcfg *)id->driver_data;

Driver data not set below.

Otherwise this looks good to me.  An alternative more common form (I think...)
is call device_get_match_data() unconditionally and if that is null follow
the driver_data path. Either way is fine though.

Could you add to the patch description where
the warning is coming from?   Build time / runtime etc and what tool?

Thanks,

Jonathan


> +	} else {
> +		dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!dcfg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -878,11 +886,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id ads7950_of_table[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ads7950_of_table);
>  
> +static const struct spi_device_id tsc2046_adc_spi_ids[] = {
> +	{ "tsc2046e-adc" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, tsc2046_adc_spi_ids);
> +
>  static struct spi_driver tsc2046_adc_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "tsc2046",
>  		.of_match_table = ads7950_of_table,
>  	},
> +	.id_table = tsc2046_adc_spi_ids,
>  	.probe = tsc2046_adc_probe,
>  	.remove = tsc2046_adc_remove,
>  };