Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@amazon.de>,
        Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/40] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Fine-grained TLB flush + L2
 TLB flush features
In-Reply-To: <20220803134110.397885-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
References: <20220803134110.397885-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:43:41 +0200
Message-ID: <8735ddvoc2.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> Changes since v8:
> - Rebase to the current kvm/queue (93472b797153)
> - selftests: move Hyper-V test pages to a dedicated struct untangling from 
>  vendor-specific (VMX/SVM) pages allocation [Sean].

Sean, Paolo,

I've jsut checked and this series applies cleanly on top of the latest
kvm/queue [372d07084593]. I also don't seem to have any feedback to
address.

Any chance this can be queued?

-- 
Vitaly