Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM7-yPTdihLsPjDKM-0OEszxNd8n0bgeRseiEkCsSZW-uuaRvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220830092839.3197-1-ppbuk5246@gmail.com> <Yw49m7Hpq+NIZYWw@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <Yw49m7Hpq+NIZYWw@arm.com>
From:   Yun Levi <ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:38:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAM7-yPQjjwM_fCgojYHbrhE4GFCX22VLoCiTVkorNG6hQDj9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/kexec: Fix missing extra range for crashkres_low.
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, will@kernel.org,
        nramas@linux.microsoft.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
> Does this need a Fixes tag and cc stable?
>
> --
> Catalin

IMHO, it seems good to add two tags like:
   Fixes: 3751e728cef29 ("arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support")
   Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

BTW, To add above two tags, should I resend the patch again with
former tags (Acked-by & Reviewed-by)?


Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Levi