From: Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
To: davids@webmaster.com
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:36:54 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKIEGCEJAC.davids@webmaster.com>
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKIEGCEJAC.davids@webmaster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart6250883.G29HFBR1ZM";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200706151137.01053.bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1210
Lines: 39

--nextPart6250883.G29HFBR1ZM
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:47, David Schwartz wrote:
> The GPL does not require it to be easy in fact to modify the piece of
> software.

Yes it does, section 3: "The source code for a work means the preferred for=
m=20
of the work for making modifications to it." It then even lists that you=20
need to provide all the scripts and stuff you use to make it easy for you.

Come on, *READ* the GPL, before you argue.

=2D-=20
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/

--nextPart6250883.G29HFBR1ZM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGcl29i4ILt2cAfDARAjcgAKDWJS4FxrmLz+Nh2iQaP9t9fAwymQCgyeFq
aC6KBL/NeroiKccIGmK5uog=
=2kPZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart6250883.G29HFBR1ZM--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/