Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp211251rwe; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6IluPoNswQ5n8SAUEqCxBv7EJ1gQ+VApYqQm/biCFes3I9DRdme3mcNZPw9BDHqZ6zK0nq X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f64d:b0:172:d004:8b2d with SMTP id m13-20020a170902f64d00b00172d0048b2dmr25008596plg.14.1661933228361; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661933228; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CLNcYXg3Q73zT9gNYk/ZWSshYxOZnIUBo2tZSiatzEqF6mpOEAAzBdvIdFDAy/P4EA UEC09lUZyNwTpwCc0MWJ2NRQyCM/fXgF+BYZvpu1EbCoda0B2l5rYIMfpQg7SJkJoKj1 te2iWPViVeHzOX+akIa1rVoLpcmkSpfl9JJtQ4o8apR35NAwzUZSbz9G+PNnlpSChikZ //3KiyomaUP3Kiv1Qzc4xLy4NP7PfrWE/o62c5otJDqSLvedMSKz5HOvGm3w5s2m/X3M 0YcCqSOqeZReOcPxd4Vgs2sl1G/fc312H+jRMTrpkILrHbztwKNZUKmXt+9LVmImaXh8 lYqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/9AjfNH9r9Xq1l+7mstPYpIiuPLgnmNbaUOiiUFgzqg=; b=AHqB5QirKxwytgaFhOJauEA4VQnS7hIbfON3GQ0eTlhdwQJmMB5bIbExlTmmuQUFT3 Ik+9G2S3pBBGrFEer9DklkWfvpFHCQuovU1IN2L5KimmTZkFqdZ+Bdw+I86WweHo/njo qZ5z82Ljoj75G1SuJkhzdoRvSjIkNmhJ+C2zrCePLFl0t99UkuTKorqca22Fq1ibMHGW 6hNYx1SyQ4wbNGIqRY1CaRcus6LtlnLlJbpgKJKDr24FWv+C2uXjaomZOg7ui8puFGTJ xyBfk132h8XTdw/P2MHV3htlULZzuCKKesZbZcvOtIDPZaQrHMu1DO4hrcRsqtmU9f4q DODQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m2-20020a170902db0200b001753aa66933si295695plx.362.2022.08.31.01.06.56; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230516AbiHaH7P (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 03:59:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54130 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231239AbiHaH6f (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 03:58:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFF731220 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from YC20090004.ad.ts.tri-ad.global ([103.175.111.222]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id TIbgoo5DzXFXxTIc9ogpNL; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:58:26 +0200 X-ME-Helo: YC20090004.ad.ts.tri-ad.global X-ME-Auth: bWFpbGhvbC52aW5jZW50QHdhbmFkb28uZnI= X-ME-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:58:26 +0200 X-ME-IP: 103.175.111.222 From: Vincent Mailhol To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , "H . Peter Anvin" , Nathan Chancellor , Tom Rix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, David Howells , Jan Beulich , Christophe Jaillet , Joe Perches , Josh Poimboeuf , Vincent Mailhol Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl to evaluate constant expressions Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:57:42 +0900 Message-Id: <20220831075742.295-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220831075742.295-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> References: <20220511160319.1045812-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> <20220831075742.295-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org __ffs(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(x) and ffz(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(~x). Because __builting_ctzl() returns an int, a cast to (unsigned long) is necessary to avoid potential warnings on implicit casts. For x86_64, the current __ffs() and ffz() implementations do not produce optimized code when called with a constant expression. On the contrary, the __builtin_ctzl() folds into a single instruction. However, for non constant expressions, the __ffs() and ffz() asm versions of the kernel remains slightly better than the code produced by GCC (it produces a useless instruction to clear eax). Use __builtin_constant_p() to select between the kernel's __ffs()/ffz() and the __builtin_ctzl() depending on whether the argument is constant or not. ** Statistics ** On a allyesconfig, before...: $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep tzcnt | wc -l 3607 ...and after: $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep tzcnt | wc -l 2600 So, roughly 27.9% of the calls to either __ffs() or ffz() were using constant expressions and could be optimized out. (tests done on linux v5.18-rc5 x86_64 using GCC 11.2.1) Note: on x86_64, the asm bsf instruction produces tzcnt when used with the ret prefix (which explain the use of `grep tzcnt' instead of `grep bsf' in above benchmark). c.f. [1] [1] commit e26a44a2d618 ("x86: Use REP BSF unconditionally") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5058741E020000780009C014@nat28.tlf.novell.com Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol --- arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h index 6ed979547086..bd49aef87ab6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -224,13 +224,7 @@ static __always_inline bool variable_test_bit(long nr, volatile const unsigned l ? constant_test_bit((nr), (addr)) \ : variable_test_bit((nr), (addr))) -/** - * __ffs - find first set bit in word - * @word: The word to search - * - * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. - */ -static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long variable__ffs(unsigned long word) { asm("rep; bsf %1,%0" : "=r" (word) @@ -238,13 +232,18 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) return word; } -/** - * ffz - find first zero bit in word - * @word: The word to search - * - * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first. - */ -static __always_inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word) +/** + * __ffs - find first set bit in word + * @word: The word to search + * + * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. + */ +#define __ffs(word) \ + (__builtin_constant_p(word) ? \ + (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(word) : \ + variable__ffs(word)) + +static __always_inline unsigned long variable_ffz(unsigned long word) { asm("rep; bsf %1,%0" : "=r" (word) @@ -252,6 +251,17 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word) return word; } +/** + * ffz - find first zero bit in word + * @word: The word to search + * + * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first. + */ +#define ffz(word) \ + (__builtin_constant_p(word) ? \ + (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(~word) : \ + variable_ffz(word)) + /* * __fls: find last set bit in word * @word: The word to search -- 2.35.1