Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp667780rwe; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:00:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6Z/XrSZIMBAK2qHylSsXr2njIVKNHn10H8J9kHksFsUzTzpTYiZgJPKEvi8aYp0lVlNoPs X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a02:20d:b0:430:3886:59e8 with SMTP id bh13-20020a056a02020d00b00430388659e8mr2190051pgb.516.1661961640838; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661961640; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TzonIC+ffwSh1E4d3TZjALeI7EGE1Z7mAHTVTsIbWcpQGVYn/uJgRca7SFmdKTZfxj wr4QIKQNxpZKA2+p4dBz5fA+iuyQ0uG1dJJhH7XJcqRIPwHfx7knYjdprBdXJi6uoVGO 612UVqNOA82xIbeJ6PQL18FiPT/8T0I0cQDE/6aDb4C1xrJFN/FZLieRrJjBiZw5P4rl j7bA1nAyGKr5D/ifUuoudhqAUgHJyEd2ctqoz8okfCmc/tqPCrC7Fw3II7qwb0o5M8Pb VaptQneZg7hGS8gg7j/2Q9sZoLZzZC4WgE66wGxuDiu7uZ2Cbzgg135MYckZbb58LHDq RXzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=KhhERfCyNccpGoog/dvlIIFlS5A44tYzQSMn2RwGZjE=; b=uBdMVxXrlEMHm59/mQNAygK/WkcuI3Ym6i9t5/zHG9sMGgo5K77ivy23j1+oa5HKzd z5kamKzbxhZ5QSynPNV/N4lbZ6QfwWbeZuAPkZciLbtzS4WJ0ZOLyderZeHqVj2ZBfFB ybkT3AMRFW3J1t8sBHacguY9iqRfft1GbcFPoEeM940HY9wOuxVCFEtiMmx8sG6YTukB ahxwMC2lOzvL0P3Oc47pJ1voAyPP1Rg7w+n/w+DYyELp1jr0PdOhzND0HCHw52ybgKzJ qSg/rsDhLbOcw9uU3ZTLiYD/BIxwSKFoznpq1TRRRtfoagePQZSmqB5kOOG2sK3Ahj/y 15yA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=IuNJWYLD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q184-20020a632ac1000000b004301e6b2eb5si2560516pgq.599.2022.08.31.09.00.29; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=IuNJWYLD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231588AbiHaP1J (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:27:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231447AbiHaP1F (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:27:05 -0400 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E32D7D0B; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48F1CE21A4; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B46F1C433D6; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661959621; bh=GZQd7XoZdv6HICFQy/4MFm0/zBVJf4WZ/VLKVKq+/2I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IuNJWYLDbOUG7abPFFgptLbrjJvCWAjrsNjzCQGZysBOep+lrX/bbfskGPirtpop9 +hW1hagcmu0eVyF5/zM1D0svhBckBMX7WVgY4g1BN+GKuiHtaxo9FJkTrLHRMmTEVH ZJY/R8trl1aBS4rcm3SpdyqJdeh327rrE3sbZotUUa3BQjlOD7j+U/9pgSKEpFrtO/ RZR4pZ/qWmFNBRxK6ReQ7hr7dJPMcTnUWugk1ufcy9f2qd9aodB8u79IiVreItyDZJ YAFke+pMPy4CzCbwWcQoj1Ga/nS6le2ZJdb5+ta5zoW4vV87pnZY9fLi6DIdlGKOYs 6ZqXNIiE7cg4A== Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:26:58 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Joel Fernandes , Dietmar Eggemann , LKML , Rushikesh S Kadam , "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , Neeraj upadhyay , Steven Rostedt , rcu , Vineeth Pillai Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Message-ID: <20220831152658.GA89704@lothringen> References: <20220829134045.GA54589@lothringen> <1f7dd31b-f4d0-5c1c-ce28-c27f75c17f05@joelfernandes.org> <20220829194622.GA58291@lothringen> <20220829204202.GQ6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20220830105324.GA71266@lothringen> <20220830114343.GS6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20220830160316.GC71266@lothringen> <20220830162244.GA73392@lothringen> <20220830164634.GC6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220830164634.GC6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:46:34AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Although who knows, may be some periodic file operation while idle are specific > > to Android. I'll try to trace lazy callbacks while idle and the number of grace > > periods associated. > > Sounds like a good start. > > And yes, we don't need to show that the whole !NOCB world needs this, > just some significant portion of it. But we do need some decent evidence. > After all, it is all too easy to do a whole lot of work and find that > the expected benefits fail to materialize. So here is some quick test. I made a patch that replaces Joel's 1st patch with an implementation of call_rcu_lazy() that queues lazy callbacks through the regular call_rcu() way but it counts them in a lazy_count. Upon idle entry it reports whether the tick is retained solely by lazy callbacks or not. I get periodic and frequent results on my idle test box, something must be opening/closing some file periodically perhaps. Anyway the thing can be tested with this branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git rcu/lazy-trace Excerpt: -0 [007] d..1. 414.226966: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.228271: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.232269: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.236269: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.468048: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.468268: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.472268: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 414.476269: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.500577: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.504253: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.508250: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.512249: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.566881: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.568252: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.572249: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 419.576255: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.666873: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.668233: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.672230: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.676232: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.737283: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.740233: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.744230: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 424.748231: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.767922: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.768209: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.772212: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.776212: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.972931: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.976214: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.980211: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [007] d..1. 429.984212: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.402139: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.404211: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.404290: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.408235: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.408304: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle -0 [003] d..1. 430.412215: rcu_needs_cpu: BAD: 1 lazy callbacks retaining dynticks-idle Thanks.