Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp730833rwe; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR40y7J2IPXNvKWCAN1CTeZA+O3CtoXaz5UVyUb8I8YXhzn3HC8GVprVgTKYAf7sVXIUD/+N X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6086:b0:731:3970:48d0 with SMTP id t6-20020a170906608600b00731397048d0mr21063751ejj.16.1661965246050; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661965246; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fZxLe3b5LPZabq1XOwFktW2Tm0VymBtCzrdcg2NO4CBIgBHvppCOZXEYwm10dMtIZM 28jmqcsMdKk29whJnQrrFr2k7iHFzcBA8JVhlye5E6wA+wRKBVDImncUI9ueupwh9+aq ngaqqPvE5762ETFPInbQDyja2Dw20Ju77PNq0qBOiCSiwlx4sucskvVrChuvOXVYSRYc LHLMQLGchYjc30NSG7PQmofiHsYV6R1fkxKe7rn0fzXsegBh16t0HYlbXLRd6+28spa0 4HA5mYSK8BkVf+8eCdVDbvGukAVlr25E2TX6iHGxXwT7joBGFYVP90wlTLES1FQnlnnQ m6zA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=++G3COAxypeyQZbXuhGnyuZYhw1740DPlPvtNk4Tmsg=; b=UJ8w0Gob8Xw9Lu5BDrABRcIAn7z3n9dtRt3rRiJI87sdNDYEoNw9X9aGPq76kBNG/U wnBHQe/XReWpXv01guc2/1bwUmYfYg8ZCQO5VYDnuaiMVQqH10pEDf/og0CMzDb/fuRD Fb+wjNDEy/irj8TGcmyRE7mT+1CSGhPK1y8U72/VbLKtpnnUmJt9UgR73RBGyB3gmFU5 hx7f9hd0MvgYCIGKIEbg8d8c0pV5E0TEr+A/1/9Q8AqMX+6p5LCHTG3E4uhdoGdlZEiR CegTlQb9cA3ltbaowbgT/LzwFxL78p1r54TJPSoze8ZqTG2iZTmqw3X5dLeYh30ohO6z /g6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="eeM/Dgpg"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jg15-20020a170907970f00b0073306ff26besi11144806ejc.969.2022.08.31.10.00.19; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="eeM/Dgpg"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232301AbiHaQlx (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:41:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38210 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232289AbiHaQls (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:41:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B75A81B23 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id 145so14609992pfw.4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=++G3COAxypeyQZbXuhGnyuZYhw1740DPlPvtNk4Tmsg=; b=eeM/Dgpg1kt885I/qM+XTBsuEw05V24t7TMi7qvy3G4nWOsx+CcQd17yJZCz9zA5+u mwOd0/jxjigywcioFKSqLgoWysvmVPBUbwws4YmXQTqXUtPOn/M5EWUY/UwZA3cJAEQI lD99kvf6tQYgi0qNvEZS2AAt8yUAdkW5rTjWBfcPGc/eCyLaw8eMBoauS0n0mm83mlOz yG9F93zFGPQIDoFbzWxJcniH23MqFOdm2UPne/zrIkJvlg9T7yfla9YllD7oU5Ayz6a4 lp9nZuWOHGbqi+pMNHwqc3ZHcBNYphnn1WplaPofqn44/JRcWP+yuYTJ2TwqOLb1xeb2 wj+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=++G3COAxypeyQZbXuhGnyuZYhw1740DPlPvtNk4Tmsg=; b=JmHpiRBg8Psch7sT3vYaBXBHrHJCc6BJ8ar1/9UTPcBlpYrn4IVt5uwdgd+GjQaS73 1yCL2lfQ9ORs3UIi+pUXREFwftn7cLQQnGbnjaCIvxUlFSkfOuKOY/8lADZddT503r/Q tmpBMBfdtzvTkuYUSYEo6v5Plfyh5/VNqF+MgSdGaeIbeAbvUIcri4H4PQvtCvNOHg62 gH4DGRHWl15JLRt1EYmFdiIt/FZnT8gFt5uLELz8k6hS/4ws4zx7JVPas5wU5vpULtL8 sWaIMALuFQPQod382YqvTLkHm+OUQYJgCENaaAKVox0yZSowXAyn9fBtQMuOlAtQ7GHS D5yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2BddQfhkq1SymVIX+KVEf/mzfbwHZg3IBNaK3aH3nFOHm79q/i cIpgjpq8yw+dxd4DbdnKcGvJHw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:91ca:0:b0:42b:4847:90dd with SMTP id l193-20020a6391ca000000b0042b484790ddmr22072544pge.28.1661964106293; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13-20020a17090a1f8d00b001f510175984sm1517590pja.41.2022.08.31.09.41.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:41:41 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suravee Suthikulpanit , Li RongQing Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] KVM: x86: Honor architectural behavior for aliased 8-bit APIC IDs Message-ID: References: <20220831003506.4117148-1-seanjc@google.com> <20220831003506.4117148-15-seanjc@google.com> <5f6d99bc28fde0c48907991b6f67009430aea243.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f6d99bc28fde0c48907991b6f67009430aea243.camel@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 00:35 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > - if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic) && !new->phys_map[xapic_id]) > > - new->phys_map[xapic_id] = apic; > > + if (kvm->arch.x2apic_format) { > > + /* See also kvm_apic_match_physical_addr(). */ > > + if ((apic_x2apic_mode(apic) || x2apic_id > 0xff) && > > + x2apic_id <= new->max_apic_id) > > + new->phys_map[x2apic_id] = apic; > > + > > + if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic) && !new->phys_map[xapic_id]) > > + new->phys_map[xapic_id] = apic; > > + } else { > > + /* > > + * Disable the optimized map if the physical APIC ID is > > + * already mapped, i.e. is aliased to multiple vCPUs. > > + * The optimized map requires a strict 1:1 mapping > > + * between IDs and vCPUs. > > + */ > > + if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) > > + physical_id = x2apic_id; > > + else > > + physical_id = xapic_id; > > + > > + if (new->phys_map[physical_id]) { > > + kvfree(new); > > + new = NULL; > > + goto out; > Why not to use the same KVM_APIC_MODE_XAPIC_FLAT | KVM_APIC_MODE_XAPIC_CLUSTER > hack here? The map's "mode" only covers logical mode (the cleanup patch renames "mode" to "logical_mode" to make this more clear). There is no equivalent for dealing with the physical IDs. Alternatively, a flag to say "physical map is disabled" could be added, but KVM already has to cleanly handle a NULL map and in all likelihood the logical map is also going to be disabled anyways. Not to mention that APIC performance is unlikely to be a priority for any guest that triggers this code :-)