Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755413AbXFOOrQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:47:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753596AbXFOOrE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:47:04 -0400 Received: from bipbip.grupopie.com ([195.23.16.24]:56587 "EHLO bipbip.grupopie.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753543AbXFOOrC (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:47:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4672A65E.6010607@grupopie.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:46:54 +0100 From: Paulo Marques Organization: Grupo PIE User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Bernd Paysan , Al Viro , Dmitry Torokhov , Krzysztof Halasa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <200706151014.45383.bernd.paysan@gmx.de> <46727CCF.9030905@grupopie.com> <200706151403.57178.bernd.paysan@gmx.de> <4672A231.9000800@grupopie.com> <20070615154522.2a161884@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20070615154522.2a161884@the-village.bc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1518 Lines: 44 Alan Cox wrote: >> But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with: " >> GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE >> Version 2, June 1991" >> >> so there is no confusion about the version. > > The version of the COPYING file (and the licence document), not of the > licence on the code. > >>> Wrong. >> Why do you say "Wrong"? Have you contributed some code to the kernel >> thinking that the kernel was "v2 or later", only to find out later that >> it wasn't? > > A fair bit of the kernel is probably v2 or later but not all of it and > that shouldn't really matter as regards the kernel anyway, the GPLv2 only > bits (if v2 only is a valid status) anchor it. So we are violently agreeing, then? This sub-thread started by me showing that: > $ find -name "*.c" | xargs grep "any later version" | wc -l > 3138 > $ find -name "*.c" | wc -l > 9482 This is a somewhat crude measure but it shows that only about 30% of the kernel is "v2 or later" and those pieces could be used on some other "v2 or later" project (including v3). But the kernel as a whole is v2 and my point was that the claim that there are just a few "v2 only" files was bogus. -- Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." Weisert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/