Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283209AbRLDP05>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:26:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S284413AbRLDOmO>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:42:14 -0500
Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:60863 "EHLO ns.caldera.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S283054AbRLDMMc>;
	Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:12:32 -0500
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:11:36 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
Message-ID: <20011204131136.B6051@caldera.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>,
	Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
In-Reply-To: <1861.1007341572@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <1861.1007341572@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:06:12PM +1100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:06:12PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> The CML1 to CML2 conversion comes later, either in 2.5.3 or 2.5.4.

Is the CML2 merge actually agreed on?
I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel hackers are
the same opinion.

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/