Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:24:43 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add
 interrupts/interrupt-names common properties
Message-ID: <20220831212443.GA267718-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20220822184701.25246-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <20220822184701.25246-10-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220822184701.25246-10-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 09:46:50PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Currently the 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names' are defined being too
> generic to really describe any actual IRQ interface. Moreover the DW PCIe
> End-point devices are left with no IRQ signals. All of that can be fixed
> by adding the IRQ-related properties to the common DW PCIe DT-schema and
> defining a common and device-specific set of the IRQ names in accordance
> with the hardware reference manual. Seeing there are common and dedicated
> IRQ signals for DW PCIe Root Port and End-point controllers we suggest to
> split the IRQ names up into two sets: common definitions available in the
> snps,dw-pcie-common.yaml schema and Root Port specific names defined in
> the snps,dw-pcie.yaml schema. The former one will be applied to both DW
> PCIe RP and EP controllers, while the later one - for the RP only.
> 
> Note since there are DW PCI-based vendor-specific DT-bindings with the
> custom names assigned to the same IRQ resources we have no much choice but
> to add them to the generic DT-schemas in order to have the schemas being
> applicable for such devices. Let's mark these names as deprecated so not
> to encourage the new DT-bindings to use them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - This is a new patch unpinned from the next one:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503214638.1895-2-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru/
>   by the Rob' request. (@Rob)
> 
> Changelog v5:
> - Add platform-specific interrupt names, but mark them as deprecated.
> ---
>  .../bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie-common.yaml     | 51 ++++++++++++++
>  .../bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml         | 17 +++++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml | 67 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I still don't like how you've done interrupts/clocks/reg. I'd suggest 
dropping it if you want this series applied soonish.

Rob