Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:28:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:27:53 -0500 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:56256 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:27:41 -0500 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15372.63827.716885.948119@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:26:59 -0800 To: Alan Cox Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, arjanv@redhat.com (Arjan van de Ven), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@linuxia64.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] patch to no longer use ia64's software mmu In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15371.62205.231945.798891@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.4.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:36:33 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox said: >> Another concern I have is that, fundamentally, I dislike the idea >> of penalizing all IA-64 platforms due to one chipset that is, >> shall we say, "lacking" (i.e., doesn't have an I/O TLB). Alan> Allow me to introduce to you the concept of CONFIG_ options 8) Alan> It makes a lot of sense to have a generic IA64 kernel, and an Alan> IA64 designed by people with a brain kernel. I think the issue at hand is whether, longer term, it is desirable to move all bounce buffer handling into the PCI DMA layer or whether Linux should continue to make bounce buffer management visible to drivers. I'd be interested in hearing opinions. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/