Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9b82849e-516b-c798-994e-6bc8945c4831@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:32:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Add new bindings of
 MediaTek frequency hopping
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@mediatek.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org
Cc:     linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
        Edward-JW Yang <edward-jw.yang@mediatek.com>
References: <20220831124850.7748-1-johnson.wang@mediatek.com>
 <20220831124850.7748-3-johnson.wang@mediatek.com>
 <b1296c37-5283-81f7-1939-7ea20e1f4d0d@linaro.org>
 <1fae0c47-fff9-89e9-c849-536d167d741d@collabora.com>
 <38910de5-89ad-e7a1-261f-18b51c8e7877@linaro.org>
 <955f7200-9d08-0d21-2d1a-5ccbd0f3a8af@collabora.com>
 <93d5de8e-31b2-4412-3348-7ba1903cde84@linaro.org>
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <93d5de8e-31b2-4412-3348-7ba1903cde84@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Il 01/09/22 12:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 01/09/2022 13:22, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> That's simply not a proper
>>> hardware description, so again:
>>>
>>> 1. If this is separate device (as you indicated), then it needs
>>> expressing the dependencies and uses of other device resources.
>>
>> Agreed. In this case, what about...
>>
>> mediatek,hopping-ssc-percents = <&provider CLK_SOMEPLL 3>;
>>
>> or would it be better to specify the clocks in a separated property?
>>
>> clocks = <&provider CLK_SOMEPLL>, <&provider CLK_SOME_OTHER_PLL>;
>> mediatek,hopping-ssc-percents = <3>, <5>;
>>
> 
> I propose the last one - using standard clocks property and a matching
> table.
> 

Right. I like the last one a bit better, as well.

Thanks for the advices!
Angelo