Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753313AbXFORWq (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:22:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751495AbXFORWj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:22:39 -0400 Received: from web52502.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.185]:33193 "HELO web52502.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751312AbXFORWi (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:22:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DHwI85BiVEfI76YSpIVgSlsaokZ4XVEiGS7MLS+g2118UQAF96Qv8//LBsCU8tsCznMZ9q9ZClu/6pf8FWp5nMv+/RwsOVZi+tg5glXTYGLNTlCGa7qmhADbpx3NjFZUpX1nnnVVgNQJESyPHUnfRM0Luzcm9muct6ur29Q/i90= ; Message-ID: <20070615172237.62204.qmail@web52502.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: glPxy5IVM1lEUDxrzwXRwLVoXvmo3fZAAPk0.fylDtsqwks6bTdLSBA3pFyZFusWZGkerk98cS0f3rtPaGGhaQJ2wMaJQ_Sriqlzs968we0_dfolgPM- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:22:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Perkel Subject: Re: Instead of GPL License - Why not LKL? (Linux Kernel License) To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80706142334m9f39383v20aff191f4501c50@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 40 --- Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel wrote: > > I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 > debate > > and the problem is that it leads to confusion. > GPL3 is > > nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to > believe > > that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved. > > > > So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is > > unhappy with GPL3 that Linux lose the GPLx license > and > > call it the Linux Kernel License or LKL for short. > So > > LKL could equal GPL2. > > It seems it would require agreement by all copyright > holders, much > like the v2->v3 transition would do. If it makes the > 2->3 transition > unfeasible, the same may apply here. Would it still be a problem if the licenses were exactly the same? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/