Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S280954AbRLDQcY>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:32:24 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278932AbRLDQcO>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:32:14 -0500
Received: from h152-148-10-6.outland.lucent.com ([152.148.10.6]:36245 "EHLO
	alpo.casc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S278625AbRLDQcH>;
	Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:32:07 -0500
From: John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15372.64078.866361.246401@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:31:10 -0500
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
In-Reply-To: <20011204131136.B6051@caldera.de>
In-Reply-To: <1861.1007341572@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
	<20011204131136.B6051@caldera.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under Emacs 20.6.1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Christoph> I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel
Christoph> hackers are the same opinion.

I'm not a hacker, but I think it's a good thing to move to CML2.  I've
tested it and it's got some nice features.  The Python issue I don't
think is too onerous to require of people.  And wasn't there someone
out there porting CML2 to straight C code?

Why are people so wedded to the CML1 language spec anyway?

John
   John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
	 stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/