Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp1406044rwe; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6sXzT5J7IJ+8fRsW/3mqMrHPWQLZVmXXBaFVGwvYJyGmDm+oilTd/pTTOreNEZWG7OW0Hd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:515:b0:447:780c:39d6 with SMTP id m21-20020a056402051500b00447780c39d6mr31285783edv.265.1662083369075; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z17-20020a05640240d100b00447e9c56162si725235edb.11.2022.09.01.18.48.54; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=NTG4NyRE; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235298AbiIBBDO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:03:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235205AbiIBBC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:02:57 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452665C952 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:02:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662080524; x=1693616524; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uKWCAEy+xEQvL8sV5pXwFx2Dg9e8LttCjUmDr+NfTVE=; b=NTG4NyREqZ8pbZAc2UcuXgP06Hhj9d+NuAtSTPmzKx7gnnXGDRlIYKZ0 +ytD4eccrND77SQ77+Q4v6Dm8pwYpPRoLKgoVUFCeWCEyNnZ+Igdfmsju Wa4gfjCi0hXJ4z//5kszV7uvDw5WyMt9jsdFGVukbBDKU2lzWRMb6rb/d +4SMPIA5PXgNotsBXOxTTSIy2WxScM8n97KI3quUf4cHVC9CAvKuDHG2m 16+XzxC0f2XVp29QORYBPBT1Njh9HJOSSBU7Bz+MbblnvPdBaHiovbMoA R3yOLc9BjBV45B5k7++AJsCaBZkYAjxXAJ5nmbZqWGSPeNqLSn1KdUcjQ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10457"; a="293441460" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,281,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="293441460" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2022 18:02:02 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,281,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="642652764" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2022 18:02:02 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:02:01 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.92) by fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:02:01 -0700 Received: from FMSEDG603.ED.cps.intel.com (10.1.192.133) by fmsmsx612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:02:01 -0700 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.102) by edgegateway.intel.com (192.55.55.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:02:00 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eADLaa0ejfq3Rj2TSOZ2qy4qk1SROwkHeJuyKC6hA6/vJFIIm76qfYMbgrd91CqSe7oP4ZqTsKjWbf2yCfzXij9J7SRH1704FNd/mCqF7yLwZEOaxbAK24CpH47W75kLonekD8iF0obdVv+E2dD4b1n8Ffs5yMKEnrYAhpcxoBcS06z0ExzwYXHWdq8+0JyAvzPJ9mITD4yJD/CotAGiZA5r5GLBAOmRoB07TkGFgMMhEmDlCIbwE9xIpdHD2WMCET+18Zww5NnNbnVXnQwgS0Gl6E9CjLsb9JZ7VWNMa3USfHVDM/sxFshDHGEjHHgeGKbippTLRFXs1KHD8kjlOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=i7fs6uOpyILCHtgHYrTxvO068PWQ5Oesy5Gu3jXaF9g=; b=kHhWRpolLbBXM6XXoD1ZC9xWjQzPg6HvT3o1om2jKcScQIeBRl41I8/7ZqcADhVw/CjpfsPImwfJNW6FkU6AYo4s55oLmiNybm7lHCWetF04YPKyNVxOeMQFlNiFHjUcnh2pNGmoZNdIEeL6+uPLkYqU2GbL/tahsQcJbZjZG8L9heWAhCtQqQt842N8zMzHX60gRMRe8RhmhS9m3yqDJps8ZUbBOxSAEogKi+ccHkM+XMyFUKBQsmKoQw3FNEM3sVacatcYxOk34Qmmbt0NjlW2o7KXgPi53z/Wz5NnRly6wKPqOj5mAFuSOUz4cTjfv03ymhi6DV6/qSBIxb0moQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=intel.com; Received: from BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:7a::28) by BN9PR11MB5354.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:11b::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5588.10; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:01:59 +0000 Received: from BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5482:e4d0:c7d9:e8be]) by BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5482:e4d0:c7d9:e8be%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5588.012; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:01:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 09:01:47 +0800 From: Philip Li To: "Chen, Rong A" CC: Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , Christophe Leroy , "kernel test robot" , Kees Cook , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "Masahiro Yamada" , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: powerpc-linux-objdump: Warning: Unrecognized form: 0x23 Message-ID: References: <202208311414.4OPuYS9K-lkp@intel.com> <8d2c3aef-aa4f-1f4d-dc89-622554ffda31@intel.com> <9d77cb93-2eff-d87d-6554-1636d5e7d5ec@csgroup.eu> <0acfb209-a792-a47b-0261-9fb29824e4b9@intel.com> <4c6da74c-4dc1-796c-5f22-bdd075b23c2b@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4c6da74c-4dc1-796c-5f22-bdd075b23c2b@intel.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: SG2PR04CA0169.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:4::31) To BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:7a::28) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 8604a164-13af-44cf-29c0-08da8c7ebcf9 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN9PR11MB5354:EE_ X-LD-Processed: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d,ExtAddr X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230016)(376002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(6636002)(86362001)(82960400001)(54906003)(2906002)(8936002)(966005)(6862004)(6486002)(478600001)(83380400001)(7416002)(44832011)(186003)(8676002)(66574015)(4326008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(5660300002)(6666004)(41300700001)(38100700002)(316002)(26005)(6512007)(53546011)(6506007)(2004002)(67856001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?iso-8859-1?Q?UHYUQ6GgwvSp400Id/LSE4raBGNkps5UW/U+IV7d4La1QAjygBjV3iznB2?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?EbYZG7wHTQyIkbUWbK2ghVQl7EkKs0uJjoMOEjv6Ou614U+X3wP+SqUU7x?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?rMjsjUoJ8dI4sHHhTeHhT/wrhwX0mewwjmrgYcBb5ofwdaAIFc4i0GjeKA?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?aOYZRmtcyZW/NCnuqvenPOBAfY+WsgH4gQ0uE5/xBmzrm9r/PvcXhCVLPZ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?eSR/CD/yPpxePPYiPmpmOzXa1dh1A0zTK5LTlGjdktQFM/aFVWU+DAAtdd?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lfp+7CNuH60wdkoqtueosfXhNRAUYsiCWqpGVkTQjy8310qkBL7cMtGaUo?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?hI/eeRtl/xjqjCBoHWKfk/fJNYSJ0Xm00SoUJKyxpcRWZYBLMc6cEprlvk?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?e9D5wVl/5iIPlHf26V0hiYSAchT2PTt8I77M5g9Q5mML9+cwFMEMG6vn1Z?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?/xuNMfhHA3EXutcHvyguNhhSKzzS9t3Vn+0D4TtpWoC/fZR2isvhkT8UMg?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?HuMup7Np7eWJgfH7mbPmnJMAJKuDSlg5pc4pJd+kNoJrirOGPMdN6M0CgG?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nr+NMv1mzACSUF+wXDY+GblrfMXjlT40Vwg2Y8UAYHEO/vq/wD51+YHIdT?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?AjgX4zUtiC6BYlME99FmfDG3LWhdmVHcY3fs5K8KdUsy5ITfqUfy2KDNnN?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?2GigDoRwi7UCgZyKZqbUpPleeMCU06rp0Aklq25A3sn+PHvc1Em/gIPcWT?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?cLajyEtk6+0WRPqdZhRwaaHBuwOKRpWcWzHGdS/x3phZozcXNLY6UYHf7C?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?W+ijs4UutfwZNArun5zM7GlxvJnR9L6ZhKEbOYLp28UrR+AHXa1vopbihl?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ow/3whyCXKu9Ryh8OFprF1xeTv/NGKGPg/2fGahFxOch7Yifi0OoEZY3ky?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?YkQh9CBvgCtMuHh3eoFuEyPVeAXJ/3+VtUGn7f1d0muRPsOcspRDbogSWE?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ns/338MwmKeXBkAbTWsOpEWNYwctqyPWPTOfuPxnqMbrWf05E9TsaENGLh?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?wMiM0EXlRQNRDjBbIgIeGCPxrvOrV0DVQoOFi3+CMYKs/2v/+xrVbzh0jv?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?zAj4Eo4hi01pUXVmEfcx5YDeHKM46xP17AQRk5zBXv+8+++77XY65rUeFA?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?U+CkVs2G0rydVEplGRjJVgUFi1HG4ivD6w4yyLwlN0jzUpo56IH8mly+iB?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?HHpiBCN5RR6rkPxI8sS97UUgg6jZNNLKFDtINnO4/T+wuE41vuvsr5maQH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?4Iw3Zs2X2fGzPMs2/Ta1Cjn8OjvVUFIol6nKeWLCTDojtnV9AmeACfUyKs?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?GXZ45uiCfkv/tcFK2Bmt6mEDF3iiCPKumgVm1QxisXtcZKGNUelFwNL+C+?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?43FDrt2ppzwS431UomHh03JFqfNed87X4s3DrYYNbTnGp8nljRF8crNdnu?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vw5YejELM7b3TnWkJf8XC8AIn9lt5YKkHFQvY1n+ZiOCY/UDvCxVoBMXVa?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?zPNknv5ZGh9hWhK7/BCT9TTwifG+0/e8jKqyBepHrglC4Pjrgm24Xge2Qa?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?RRGkTCsCfM3iPF2V+ejrRbtC0hVKxe/8X+IgPUh6hawVyWhV0/59mxqg?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3D=3D?= X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8604a164-13af-44cf-29c0-08da8c7ebcf9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL0PR11MB2995.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2022 01:01:59.4153 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: ZIlKrgB+kWXLcNCMswMiZ/9eqOJ400v6m7ocEWf2xesuoyJYY72gVoEODSLotXM7LXNEw4TxbeY5KEl4Vged+A== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN9PR11MB5354 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 08:54:14AM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote: > > > On 9/2/2022 1:04 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 9:55 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 01:52:42PM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/2022 1:45 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 01/09/2022 ? 06:59, Chen, Rong A a ?crit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/2022 10:03 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Rong, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:15:58AM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/31/2022 11:40 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:52:36PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > tree: > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > > > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > > head: dcf8e5633e2e69ad60b730ab5905608b756a032f > > > > > > > > > > commit: f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee Kconfig.debug: > > > > > > > > > > make DEBUG_INFO selectable from a choice > > > > > > > > > > date: 5 months ago > > > > > > > > > > config: powerpc-buildonly-randconfig-r003-20220830 > > > > > > > > > > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220831/202208311414.4OPuYS9K-lkp@intel.com/config) > > > > > > > > > > compiler: clang version 16.0.0 > > > > > > > > > > (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project > > > > > > > > > > c7df82e4693c19e3fd2e25c83eb04d9deb7b7b59) > > > > > > > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > > > > > > > > > wget > > > > > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > > > > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > > > > > > # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build > > > > > > > > > > # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu > > > > > > > > > > # > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee > > > > > > > > > > git remote add linus > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > > > > > > > > > git fetch --no-tags linus master > > > > > > > > > > git checkout f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee > > > > > > > > > > # save the config file > > > > > > > > > > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > > > > > > > > > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang > > > > > > > > > > make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerpc-linux-objdump: Warning: Unrecognized form: 0x23 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given this is clang 16.0.0 with > > > > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y, which uses DWARF5 by > > > > > > > > > default instead of DWARF4, it looks like older binutils not > > > > > > > > > understanding DWARF5. What version of binutils is being used by the > > > > > > > > > bot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Nathan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We're using binutils v2.38.90.20220713-2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||/ Name Version Architecture Description > > > > > > > > +++-==============-==================-============-========================================== > > > > > > > > ii binutils 2.38.90.20220713-2 amd64 GNU assembler, > > > > > > > > linker and binary utilities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for chiming in! This looks like the output of 'dpkg -l', right? I > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Nathan, > > > > > > > > > > > > oh, yes, I misunderstood, it's not related to this package. > > > > > > > > > > > > > noticed on second glance that the tuple for the objdump warning above is > > > > > > > 'powerpc-linux-', which leads me to believe that a kernel.org toolchain > > > > > > > (or a self compiled one) is being used. I would expect the tuple to be > > > > > > > 'powerpc-linux-gnu-' if Debian's package was being used. Is that > > > > > > > possible? > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we used a self-compiled toolchain, we'll try the binutils > > > > > > from debian package. > > > > > > > > > > Can you first tell us the version you are using ? > > > > > > > > > > powerpc-linux-objdump -v > > > > > > > > > > That will tell you the version. > > > > > > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > > > > > the version is v2.38: > > > > > > > > $ ./powerpc-linux-objdump -v > > > > GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.38 > > > > Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > > This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of > > > > the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later > > > > version. > > > > This program has absolutely no warranty. > > > > > > Thanks! I did some research and it seems like this warning is expected > > > with binutils older than 2.39. The warning appears to come from > > > read_and_display_attr_value() in binutils/dwarf.c. 0x22 and 0x23 are > > > DW_FORM_loclistx and DW_FORM_rnglistx, which were only recently > > > supported in that function. > > > > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28981 > > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=19c26da69d68d5d863f37c06ad73ab6292d02ffa > > > > > > That change shipped in binutils 2.39. I am not really sure how we should > > > work around this in the kernel, other than maybe requiring binutils > > > 2.39+ for CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5. Unfortunately, that will not fix > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT when DWARF5 is the default > > > version... > > > > I've been working on a series that will encode the default implicit > > dwarf version based on compiler version check. Maybe that can be > > extended/reused here once that lands? > > https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/20220831184408.2778264-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/ > > Series needs revision, but it's on the right track. > > > > > Alternatively, switching to llvm-objdump for clang builds > > > would help :) I am not aware of any issues that would affect that switch > > > for PowerPC: > > > > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/labels/%5BTOOL%5D%20llvm-objdump > > > > Oh, is 0day doing `make CC=clang` rather than `make LLVM=1`? Rong, > > any chance we get 0day folks to test LLVM=1 for more architectures? > > Ideally we'd test both, preferably LLVM=1 if we had to choose. > > Hi Nick, > > Thanks for your advice, yes, we are doing `make CC=clang`, we'll plan it > recently. Hi Nick, add one question here, if we switch to LLVM=1, as not all old kernel commits can support this option, do you suggest we only focus clang build on the kernel that supports LLVM=1 or we need switch to CC=clang if LLVM is not supported? > > Best Regards, > Rong Chen > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nathan > > > > > > >