Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   isaku.yamahata@intel.com
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
        Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 19/22] KVM: x86: Delete kvm_arch_hardware_enable/disable()
Date:   Thu,  1 Sep 2022 19:17:54 -0700
Message-Id: <ced5fb5b451d141dec5d8de3e3cadb4bf2a88f10.1662084396.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1662084396.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
References: <cover.1662084396.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

Now they're function call and there is no point to keep them.
Opportunistically make kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup() empty.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fa68bea655f0..f0382f3d5baf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn)
 
 	/*
 	 * Disabling irqs at this point since the following code could be
-	 * interrupted and executed through kvm_arch_hardware_disable()
+	 * interrupted and executed through hardware_disable()
 	 */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (msrs->registered) {
@@ -11834,17 +11834,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector);
 
-int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
-{
-	return static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
-}
-
-void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
-{
-	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
-	drop_user_return_notifiers();
-}
-
 static cpumask_t cpus_hardware_enabled = CPU_MASK_NONE;
 
 static int __hardware_enable(void *caller_name)
@@ -11856,7 +11845,7 @@ static int __hardware_enable(void *caller_name)
 
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return 0;
-	r = kvm_arch_hardware_enable();
+	r = static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
 	if (r)
 		pr_warn("kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d failed during %s()\n",
 			cpu, (const char *)caller_name);
@@ -11882,12 +11871,13 @@ static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return;
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled);
-	kvm_arch_hardware_disable();
+	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
+	drop_user_return_notifiers();
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup(void)
 {
-	on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+	/* TODO: eliminate this function */
 }
 
 /*
@@ -11978,7 +11968,7 @@ void kvm_arch_resume(int usage_count)
 
 	if (kvm_arch_check_processor_compat())
 		return;
-	if (kvm_arch_hardware_enable())
+	if (static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)())
 		return;
 
 	local_tsc = rdtsc();
@@ -12119,6 +12109,8 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
 
 void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
 {
+	on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+
 	kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks();
 
 	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup)();
-- 
2.25.1