Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758704AbXFOUcA (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:32:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758281AbXFOUa6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:30:58 -0400 Received: from keil-draco.com ([216.193.185.50]:50244 "EHLO mail.keil-draco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756607AbXFOUa4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:30:56 -0400 From: Daniel Hazelton To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:30:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Carlo Wood , Bernd Paysan , Theodore Tso , Alexandre Oliva , Sean , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Alan Cox , Greg KH , debian developer , david@lang.hm, Tarkan Erimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu References: <20070615162216.GG3588@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070615162216.GG3588@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706151630.43499.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1763 Lines: 48 On Friday 15 June 2007 12:22:16 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:45:43AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Carlo Wood wrote: > > The way "collective works" work, there are two separate copyrights: there > > is the copyright in the "separate contribution", which is vests > > ininitally in the author of that contribution (unless he signs over his > > copyrights, often by virtue of working for somebody else). > > > > And then there is the copyright in the "collective work", which would be > > me. > > > > Of course, owning coyright in the "collective work" doesn't actually give > > me complete control anyway. I cannot relicense things in ways that go > > against the rules of the individual works. But in a very real sense, yes, > > I actually do own a certain (*limited*) copyright over even the parts > > that have not been explicitly signed over to me. > >... > > Does this include GPLv2'ed code not intended to be used in the Linux > kernel submitted by people other than the copyright holder for inclusion > in the Linux kernel? > > If yes, the FSF has exactly the same rights if taking a GPLv2 driver > from the Linux kernel and including it in GNU Hurd. Of course they do. That is defined by the license. They can include it with HURD, but that doesn't give them copyright to it, just the right to exercise the rights granted by the license. DRH > > > Linus > > cu > Adrian -- Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/