Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759359AbXFOXVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:21:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757101AbXFOXVh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:21:37 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:43189 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756998AbXFOXVg (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:21:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:20:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Oleg Verych cc: Adrian Bunk , Andi Kleen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Diego Calleja , Chuck Ebbert , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <200704291849.23197.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070429173725.GB30248@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 24 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no idea how it has > ended (wiki? hand-mailing?). I'm hoping it's not "ended". IOW, I really don't think we _resolved_ anything, although the work that Adrian started is continuing through the wiki and other people trying to track regressions, and that was obviously something good. But I don't think we really know where we want to take this thing in the long run. I think everybody wants a better bug-tracking system, but whether something that makes people satisfied can even be built is open. It sure doesn't seem to exist right now ;) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/