Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp318252rwb; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6QXjOsK2JrGxpainxuu4eCZaFTT8+zRD72I9OV6pTRn3wwGa73KkccKxfWLXOynLEHWyGk X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2c9:b0:172:57d5:d6f0 with SMTP id s9-20020a17090302c900b0017257d5d6f0mr38731515plk.61.1662155746796; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 14:55:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662155746; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IRsuCFe3NSYD0Db6k2zodyrPYapNwPSQJ7KdrNUXPRtBcVqG+4dT913x87dYnEiTYg LpXe4HWt+nYghqGw4RFDziV1U/FRSe+VPpkrCMFzKgFz5aVZ07rwEVSJPtnvZc5jCl95 FquG2aiLpL79OrSqOTIE0L0HxOELj/Kc1NccBhabkrXRJVQuV3WCD2IZBrUa0qXJXHuO 5FtYfZnb3XUXwOcBqcIidTXe2+tN0xWDCX5SvBQiOIKZbjADS/TqM1l7J6sx5la9cEBK V0WF1i6rhcq7niShKCw9Z7tn5qo9Jgj5lFPI6iFByTOlaHlAmm8XAQfcbYnMSMnP0ZWg +qGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=/mc1MiX+U2pcHLov/3qEbkqcM9lCxpiueiff0h+FJ+U=; b=GBtgwUvX5huDTfjVFYyV//TUO7GwsXnCdwkdNWHyNRZhzn8MnfQecSxFBAkAgXxKSA ThAOO4/38lgCyjMdgR9/PPyujSq3uE1wFI4xbgGsJNYJdtL5F7iLldKwnX6wSgbZBNRD jlJAAHNIz7oGUjiUSxHai7bQ05wvxRrcl5iMQbG0tOA69oFK20of2RkOQBkrkAA2Qktm 3yutzV/lIDyRKrVnscCAkUvoZCwziYIX3J/HcXja/niQceyvN7FRLnhOUCGVTGa+Qd/w 03QPCFFKzvmTCyENrlQBObGJ7hiw43UyhfEnFjD1JPjiIEVtPHXn9YWSoc0Wjxq1e+wm 130Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Q2EerrFu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lw7-20020a17090b180700b001fdce3486bfsi9230476pjb.102.2022.09.02.14.55.34; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 14:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Q2EerrFu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231210AbiIBViB (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:38:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40350 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231202AbiIBVh6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:37:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x64a.google.com (mail-pl1-x64a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::64a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9795F54A7 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id u14-20020a170902e5ce00b00174b2ad8435so1927375plf.12 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 14:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=/mc1MiX+U2pcHLov/3qEbkqcM9lCxpiueiff0h+FJ+U=; b=Q2EerrFu6GSc9+qdM21d39Ok1/UrtvKv9CPuKZnNEjP+CBLHM0P/0qMaUquffuhaKx pfR483A9uJppNTh7XewDu1pr6uVOLwVHqAdfY2GAW7FSLlYIqCWJ6cmhqo7Bsvvm8lXD 7CQbeNE1Z1V3usBkx72vBtT5Ua8wkk9nDQGc7DXXqQxcYykqCJHrUiQO0LVf0Q8IOV2K JP5NhWrhb9tF20Wz2nA9xYX3Jnl4yUgNAMmYYoGgqfoEVEtbVxpwT3MjcpCzaxqzGTsy GpjqMb9a0HMBon5oX8PcVmDy1Pl3GOgMtHAqsunGj01rTDfSPzAhrLxPXKYffWw9712W 6JAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=/mc1MiX+U2pcHLov/3qEbkqcM9lCxpiueiff0h+FJ+U=; b=o+6e1FOEqQBz/obcudAIgO+CYhvxyojJwvERh2Nhn1PmCdwQeXp8dIwV/ptYUC02zI FyliEUlsqyGNWmZcfcEmgm99cif3B7Xga6RuasVXT0/vrL92M6wp7Sl78u9Ta2oQ8FFx 26JbK1zh1CvTVJs3xcwgTE9ws7aoAn3ENM66Ap5WilheWzI6SdZFT4qJE4vKY9q5iRIM KxwPrVpptMdTKC63KDebJa7CFx2vqk85vhaxRnwXITJUtF9xMR9LMB5P+eRXPBhkCj1a /yrYGCxxeOsZeCnTeMuyY3HDA8wf9Ozkc+0+ONIP9+mRZVtqtVjcboT+3txvgXHFpIDS 4XhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1j4Fw0+E6GeY/Rv1zYqFUfuKO2cYLkA32VjCv1ItdKd86o0wyy F/uwGkPNnyvfvfIOM5PFkc/5Mqhh X-Received: from fawn.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5795]) (user=morbo job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:903:1cf:b0:176:8160:ac60 with SMTP id e15-20020a17090301cf00b001768160ac60mr106488plh.113.1662154675336; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 14:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 21:37:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220902213750.1124421-1-morbo@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220902213750.1124421-1-morbo@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog Message-ID: <20220902213750.1124421-2-morbo@google.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/paravirt: clean up typos and grammaros From: Bill Wendling To: Juergen Gross , "Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)" , Alexey Makhalov , VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , llvm@lists.linux.dev Cc: Bill Wendling Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Drive-by clean up of the comment. [ Impact: cleanup] Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h index 89df6c6617f5..f04157456a49 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); * Unfortunately, this is a relatively slow operation for modern CPUs, * because it cannot necessarily determine what the destination * address is. In this case, the address is a runtime constant, so at - * the very least we can patch the call to e a simple direct call, or + * the very least we can patch the call to a simple direct call, or, * ideally, patch an inline implementation into the callsite. (Direct * calls are essentially free, because the call and return addresses * are completely predictable.) @@ -339,10 +339,10 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); * on the stack. All caller-save registers (eax,edx,ecx) are expected * to be modified (either clobbered or used for return values). * X86_64, on the other hand, already specifies a register-based calling - * conventions, returning at %rax, with parameters going on %rdi, %rsi, + * conventions, returning at %rax, with parameters going in %rdi, %rsi, * %rdx, and %rcx. Note that for this reason, x86_64 does not need any * special handling for dealing with 4 arguments, unlike i386. - * However, x86_64 also have to clobber all caller saved registers, which + * However, x86_64 also has to clobber all caller saved registers, which * unfortunately, are quite a bit (r8 - r11) * * The call instruction itself is marked by placing its start address @@ -360,22 +360,22 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); * There are 5 sets of PVOP_* macros for dealing with 0-4 arguments. * It could be extended to more arguments, but there would be little * to be gained from that. For each number of arguments, there are - * the two VCALL and CALL variants for void and non-void functions. + * two VCALL and CALL variants for void and non-void functions. * * When there is a return value, the invoker of the macro must specify * the return type. The macro then uses sizeof() on that type to - * determine whether its a 32 or 64 bit value, and places the return + * determine whether it's a 32 or 64 bit value and places the return * in the right register(s) (just %eax for 32-bit, and %edx:%eax for - * 64-bit). For x86_64 machines, it just returns at %rax regardless of + * 64-bit). For x86_64 machines, it just returns in %rax regardless of * the return value size. * - * 64-bit arguments are passed as a pair of adjacent 32-bit arguments + * 64-bit arguments are passed as a pair of adjacent 32-bit arguments; * i386 also passes 64-bit arguments as a pair of adjacent 32-bit arguments * in low,high order * * Small structures are passed and returned in registers. The macro * calling convention can't directly deal with this, so the wrapper - * functions must do this. + * functions must do it. * * These PVOP_* macros are only defined within this header. This * means that all uses must be wrapped in inline functions. This also -- 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog