Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp430013rwb; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:16:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7S+nqaUaz0teTxczu5MpMkLGEaU58Sn+oWZO88ScrveoEExhVx8g4jNbaeu+ZFGhTF6AEY X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b10:b0:1fe:55ab:56aa with SMTP id nu16-20020a17090b1b1000b001fe55ab56aamr7291043pjb.11.1662164183748; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:16:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662164183; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eT+f+ktk2BMNUyJRtZzVig1C1GeAgO+UtpOlI4E0w2CQf/iO8PrUETirt9Smczl2U5 MOvoHZsQxwj/CZOh3lKbZj3egHJSpJCdvHaqewH1cxehBaCkVFI03A32cG18pvtG4qTA vq88XKPDs5P9jldQyVRuVi+JrZqwFtVR8a5Wo4QnBXi0UVLeOQ4sHQ287/uhGENDx0NM SM5wFc9baxmZnlaRtuC0QIEyU/5aw8nkpWynXxygniIwJ7ksrZazr9VthxS1FPxKKHtS /eItIjJWYbNnHI4sCTHmtzuqq1pdIR9IH+DaHDsmoR/9/lx+A4E7VXBuYlUkPWAG2x+w AOEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=BbAIzooJk8WHeASdww7mX0AjrS8Tjht2aof9ZiGIvoo=; b=I/bp7h8cMX2Nf7o51BEz0XGyxteXOa8TopPinOq2huoX/G6d9tdRnW4lM7Dc6hAmN3 4CCrghi5xqoQeqZzafVqdqFMtPM1UTWCXrLF73fti2NXuHOI6M4c+wsRJLoYcBsJ2TPt oJZxsakLh1Lk4XadMVIrGqZzpKOdi9SRSX3mAOo9fCdU7i1LhdU28W/suQIkl3JLyqTz 3UyiUeiXAJC8nGppt00aW/BEwjNCKa2pAzA/0SUZOnPNWwVQWLS+aC8gx4FrvrNmX092 vZYCaOMIAb2pqOyKRFZ4vqWh+UBJu6VapnsOb5cvfto47dxg7BrhxPLV6kBaOnyGwh7W ed+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=jPUEcjzT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r10-20020a63ec4a000000b0040da5486b4dsi3132350pgj.489.2022.09.02.17.16.12; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=jPUEcjzT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229946AbiIBX4o (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 19:56:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbiIBX4m (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 19:56:42 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACBE3DDA9A; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662163001; x=1693699001; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnSeA2s0ZqwQIAEryzw/fkfvhxBxnJlfAEFdXa5WICQ=; b=jPUEcjzTE9lQOcKuGLRiu34gVyCr5Jb9FCexe13QGlEz4nmM+YdQ1dK6 8MNt1TrLn/bwhK4I0gCvlmpVxoFExRitcq0cs7AsAOhsMMs8UnpwrMIrW w5D1BMifxm3YuNty3/iBX2ajg5UIqwsQ6C2Ks1c4WK85Bhz8mUUZsGVjc /Cy3P86C5pw+myLZPyGximifulgKod4tccIAHcNg63mHe8FLC/rhrpHvf c7fY80a9+2dLOsiIv5wC7STY71dcKACxiIhpiqAD1qkFtTjhVdakGHzoi 9iGAYAYUZ4bNPFedqjgR21POSx1EZNNCgOkfW/uw9/srOGCX/zmtkjlyQ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10458"; a="279125309" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,285,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="279125309" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2022 16:56:41 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,285,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="755422551" Received: from cgoff-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.53.13]) ([10.209.53.13]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2022 16:56:40 -0700 Message-ID: <8f4c3040-392e-f64d-4f30-a4e6838f9a1d@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:56:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI/PTM: Implement pci_enable_ptm() for Root Ports, Switch Upstream Ports Content-Language: en-US To: Bjorn Helgaas , Kai-Heng Feng , Rajvi Jingar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Cc: Koba Ko , Mika Westerberg , "David E . Box" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas References: <20220902233543.390890-1-helgaas@kernel.org> <20220902233543.390890-3-helgaas@kernel.org> From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy In-Reply-To: <20220902233543.390890-3-helgaas@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/2/22 4:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c > index b6a417247ce3..ad283818f37b 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c > @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity) > if (!pos) > return -EINVAL; > > - pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap); > - if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ)) > - return -EINVAL; > - May be saving PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ enabled state here and using it below only for endpoints checks will reduce the code duplication? > /* > + * Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports have been configured > + * by pci_ptm_init(), so preserve their PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT and > + * granularity. > + * > * For a PCIe Endpoint, PTM is only useful if the endpoint can > * issue PTM requests to upstream devices that have PTM enabled. > * > @@ -179,19 +179,39 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity) > * device, so there must be some implementation-specific way to > * associate the endpoint with a time source. > */ > - if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) { > + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT || > + pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) { > + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) { > + ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); > + if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled) > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl); Why read PCI_PTM_CTRL state only for root and upstream ports? The same logic will work for endpoints and RC endpoints right? What not use dev->ptm_granularity for root ports? > + ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE; > + } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) { > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap); > + if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); > if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled) > return -EINVAL; > > dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity; > + ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE; > + ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8; > } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) { > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap); > + if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > dev->ptm_granularity = 0; > + ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE; > + ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8; > } else > return -EINVAL; > > - ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE; > - ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8; > pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl); > dev->ptm_enabled = 1; > -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer